3 ms·
Mathematics is a simplification methodology and doesn't necessarily match what actually exists. So to say that the original comment is "false" means that you ha
by oldandtired 4y ago
Mathematics is a simplification methodology and doesn't necessarily match what actually exists. So to say that the original comment is "false" means that you have to "prove" that it is false in the sense of the logical and mathematical axioms you use.
If those axioms are changed, you get a different logical and mathematical outcome.
- pdonis 4y ago> to say that the original comment is "false" means that you have to "prove" that it is false in the sense of the logical and mathematical axioms you use. The comment I responded to was making a categorical statement. A single counterexample is sufficient to falsify it. The entire family of FRW models used in cosmology, in all of which the statement I responded to is false, are counterexamples.
- oldandtired 4y agoWhat I was commenting on was your categorical claim that the selected portion of the original comment was false and you have not provided that mathematical "proof". As for a single counter example, you need to demonstrate that the counter example is applicable. I don't think you have. At least not to the degree that would support your categorical claim. In regards to both of your views, I am making no statement as to validity or otherwise of those statements. This is simply a matter of asking for you and him to provide supporting evidence for your respective positions. This would then allow further discussion on the views and their evidence.