Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
oehpr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
oehpr
3y ago
This is a good question, but people are pretty sensitive to pitch changes, I think we would detect the motor slowing down. It would be super easy to reveal as well. A family member with the same toothbrush, your head finishes first. Motor s
62.
▲
by
oehpr
3y ago
this an joke in reference to unidan and a flamewar about crows in 2014. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/people/unidan
63.
▲
by
oehpr
3y ago
I get the need... but that is one perverse incentive right there.
64.
▲
by
oehpr
3y ago
Exactly. Don't negotiate with people who operate in bad faith.
65.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
I'm reading though your responses trying to figure out what mysterious force is present in this hypothetical proportional representation country that prevents a majority subset of parties B - Z from forming a coalition. Can't figu
66.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
Here is my opinion regarding how to fight this. Spam is exploiting a broken trust model. If I make a brand new account on hacker news, tell me why you should trust it? Because I'll tell you right now how much you DO trust it, it's
67.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
I would agree with your position on the assumption that the skills being taught by universities are truly valuable. My computer science and engineering course didn't teach git. I got a test on CSS and I wasn't allowed to use refer
68.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
Oooof. You may be able to disable that in googles ad choices setting. Assuming you have a google account. To get there, when you see a youtube add, there should be some text in the bottom right, "Ad 1 of 2" and then an information
69.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
I used to think that was a negative until I realized I had more in common with the people who had that extension installed than I did with youtube at large.
70.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
We shouldn't be blaming the pencils those journalists used either I suppose, the graphite didn't have an intent to deceive. But those pencils, like those journalists, operated in an environment that makes deception a goal, and the
71.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
Funny how, in my life experience, "It was just a joke" has been the exclusive use of people who were definitely not joking, absolutely intended to do harmful things, and simply liked hurting people. They simply thought that so lon
72.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
I've thought a lot about this, and I still scratch my head over what might work. The system I think kinda fits is bug bounties. Someone registers a problem, a need, and submits a reward for filling it. Others who have that problem can
73.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
They are addressing the point directly. Could you be more specific with your criticism?
74.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
Indeed, they can go fuck themselves. But if copyright law gets put in place against AI, the only ones who will be able to enjoy the benefits of AI are the people who can go fuck themselves. The gatekeepers that will just add yet another lin
75.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
Maybe tup would interest you? https://gittup.org/tup/examples.html I've been considering it for the next time I do a project that needs this kind of ordered construction. tup comes packed with a lua parser that ge
76.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
ugh, how tedious. Famous images prevelant in the dataset that are trained against many times and the directly requested are produced as is, because that's litterally what was requested and the model was trained against them. There'
77.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
>it is wholly uncreative in a way that humans are not The work I've seen manipulating, weilding, and modifying this new tool, has been very creative In painting, reprompting, texture and uv map generation, dreambooth and dedicated f
78.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
>A closer parallel would be the industrialisation of painting duplication But they directly reproduce the source material. AI art they clearly does not. The luddites seem a better parallel when it comes to scale. Where a machine comes al
79.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
The catch here is that the engine doesn't understand the objective in its search. To the engine, getting the king in check with an obvious response is no issue, in human chess its game over. My bet (uninformed, very novice at chess) is
80.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
"gold hydrogen" My god the hydrocarbon industry is shameless. "Our hydrogen got dumped on with this color grading system." "Not with out gold tier ultra premium deluxe hydrogen." And what happens to the carbon
81.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
I don't think I understand. This pari-mutuel system (I always knew the system but did not know the name) seems near canonical to me. And the incentives seem clear cut. It seems to me that if you feel the odds for or against any predict
82.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
Right?! I was thinking the same thing. Some kind of pull up gantry that lets you access everything. Or how about a vertical carousel? Like a paternoster on its side? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternoster_lift That
83.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
I would as well... but how would you actually target an actual shill? You'd need a dataset of confirmed shills. If you have a dataset of people who you speculate to be shills, doesn't that trend close to a dataset of people who&#x
84.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
This doesn't even seem like a viable strategy. When you're on forms and you're discussing a topic you're interested in, you add that thread to your watch list. You come back to the forum and check on updates for the thre
85.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
There is literally a billboard on the highway in British Columbia that is a pair of skidmarks descending into a valley with large font that says "KEEP YOUR EYES ON THE ROAD". During the night this sign is lit like a christmas tree
86.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
I think, in disagreement with other responses, almost everyone understands a random advert is not sponsoring the content it is near. But if you hate 1. the advert, or 2. the content, then you can make a public argument that they are and t
87.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
We're talking about h-m-m right now? Is your suggestion to simply name a node '[ ] thing to do'? I could talk at length about the ergonomic deficiencies there but I wanted to verify first that I understood you correctly.
88.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
I love this. Honestly if this had the same tasking capabilities as minder https://github.com/phase1geo/Minder I might just make the jump to it. Using mind maps as a tasking app has worked out well for me. This project
89.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
Imagine for a moment we all stop what we're doing, crack our knuckles, and then REALLY clean our planet up. Clear the oceans of plastics, the sky of co2, the lands of garbage, and our hearts of consumption. And then humanity gets wiped
90.
▲
by
oehpr
4y ago
Interesting, that seems to meet the objectors complaints. So... what's with the failure? Why is this happening?
More ›