oaiey

50 ms·

901.
by oaiey 5y ago
I come from a normal German city, nothing fancy, and have been overall roughly a year in the US. Boston, Princeton, Philadelphia, NY state. I am wealthy, privileged and was guided safely I can absolutely confirm the sentiment of the OP, not
902.
by oaiey 5y ago
If it fully works, it is at least under my control what data I handover to the advertisers. So it is better. I just think that it will not achieve the endgoal because every user will just deactivate it and the ad business will find another
903.
by oaiey 5y ago
I think Excel shows us that you can do a lot with a beginner friendly toolbox.
904.
by oaiey 5y ago
Richness is a factor to enable this but the differentiator is will. A lot of rich kids waste their time with BS... This one worked hard and showed will to do something. Let us appreciate this.
905.
by oaiey 5y ago
So either, this was a very progressive place or it is sad when the directors had a woman directly next to them but without even a role (like secretary or assistant). Seems like the gender was then enough to classify as an assistant on the h
906.
by oaiey 5y ago
Does outlook meanwhile have a free tier for custom domain? Same boat like everyone when it comes to the family usage.
907.
by oaiey 5y ago
Well Microsoft just needs to found a company owned 51% by a European entity /shareholders and operated by Europeans. Like that, the cloud act cannot be enforced. MS licenses the Azure/Office/whatever to this company so it wil
908.
by oaiey 5y ago
Germany as well. Merkel is still running the country according to the CIA.
909.
by oaiey 5y ago
Speaking of lightness: Is it just me, or is the Java folder-per-namespace thingy a huge turn-down when it comes to lightness?
910.
by oaiey 5y ago
I think your model works for a small scale and/or tight knowledge/architecture control. I had very bad experiences with SL at scale. I guess a lot of us would let the DI container create a transient object (2: commands) for your c
911.
by oaiey 5y ago
Completely agree! That is the reason I also name the use cases. The general purpose pattern is bad, the specialized cases are not.
912.
by oaiey 5y ago
That is exactly the point why dynamic factories are okay but service locator is not. A dynamic factory has a purpose and typically a base type. It is not arbitrary or superpower.
913.
by oaiey 5y ago
Two of the three arguments are dynamic factories and one is slow startup (which very often is a situation for approving shortcuts aka hacks). So in summary: the anti-pattern stands ;)
914.
by oaiey 5y ago
I am careful on what side I am favouring. There is Apple, a company known for its golden cage system and then there are the telcos with their strange extra features. In the end, I want to have a clean network. And that means no private rela
915.
by oaiey 5y ago
Okay... So it is not a implicit operator. That is good. Some small reputation points are regained. Thanks.
916.
by oaiey 5y ago
Unfortunately no irony. I come from a programming platform (C#) where productivity is a key element of language design. I highly doubt that Anders Heijlsberg would have accepted such a error prone concept like a literal free implicit operat
917.
by oaiey 5y ago
I do not see this from a verification perspective ... But also from a productivity perspective.
918.
by oaiey 5y ago
This is indeed the point. Some use cases are amazing and increase quality while others are just pure evil.
919.
by oaiey 5y ago
I completely get that. That is a very nice feature for building DSL or libraries with special needs. But it makes the overall language very dangerous. Is this "operator" overloadable on each type in Python? And that scares me a lo
920.
by oaiey 5y ago
While I agree, this is somehow something I expect. Implicit string concatenation without operator or function around it sounds just like a terrible idea. It breaks the basic syntax concept of `foo X bar`. On the other hand it is probably ve
921.
by oaiey 5y ago
I am a bit in shock. Accidental string concatenation. Python just lost a lot of reputation in my brain.
922.
by oaiey 5y ago
Absolutely right. But the OP pushed complained about a strong OOP influence and to that I reacted :)
923.
by oaiey 5y ago
I am a long term C# dev and have my educated guesses in what I am shepherd to ... But I am very curious about your opinion here since I am probably blind to this. And to keep the discourse focused on the interesting things, let us exclude &
924.
by oaiey 5y ago
While that is a correct assessment that it is massively overlooked, most of us lost more time in 10 liners than in 10k projects.
925.
by oaiey 5y ago
It is either OOP or FP. You will not make everyone happy. Procedural programming unfortunately does not scale for the needs of the PSR. Remember, the group started as a platform standardization (between the laravel level projects) and not P
926.
by oaiey 5y ago
It is also key to understand that they are far more diverse than ever. Azure earns money independently, so does Office and Windows, XBox, etc. They do not rely on each other anymore. The only big part which is different is the former develo
927.
by oaiey 5y ago
I am not deep into the topic. Is that maybe because of a SIMD variant is possible in one algorithm and not the other. .NET is doing a lot of processor specific optimization right now and getting from that it's current speed. On pure pa
928.
by oaiey 5y ago
Amazon (Cloud and Shopping), Apple (Hardware), Google (Search, Apps, Cloud) and Microsoft (Cloud, Apps) will be fine. Amazon, Apple and Google will be more regulated but will stabilize like Microsoft. I do not see a growth model for Faceboo
929.
by oaiey 5y ago
It is amazing. But two major incidents within 30 years time range are not so amazing. When we continue in that rate we will have a serious problem. And with aging reactors and instability everywhere it does not look good.
930.
by oaiey 5y ago
Because most original API (DOM, browser, date, etc) are OO oriented and you stick your standard library in one pattern. And speaking of everyone moving to functional programming: i work with several hundred developers in four continents in

More ›