3 ms·
While I agree, this is somehow something I expect. Implicit string concatenation without operator or function around it sounds just like a terrible idea. It bre
by oaiey 5y ago
While I agree, this is somehow something I expect. Implicit string concatenation without operator or function around it sounds just like a terrible idea. It breaks the basic syntax concept of `foo X bar`. On the other hand it is probably very handy with DSLs and things like that.
- wruza 5y agoNot so much DSLs, it's probably something as banal and ancient as usage = ( 'usage: foo [options] filenames...\n' ' -f force concatenation\n' ' -c for convenience\n' ) print usage Edit: forgot to add parentheses