noxer

26 ms·

241.
by noxer 5y ago
>Kids don't make medical decisions. Their parents do. Yes and and that should not change. >Separating people is not what a Gay-Straight Alliance does. It's in the name. Not sure if naiv or trolling but obviously the name is
242.
by noxer 5y ago
This is totally absurd. Of cause it has long therm effects whether these effects are declared as "harm" or not is subjective and whether they can be "legally" associated to puberty blockers is p much irrelevant. It obvio
243.
by noxer 5y ago
Maybe read the Context? "take into account" doesn't mean we medicate people as they wish, with what they wish to be medicate with. Else you would need to give a dug addict more drugs. And you cant improve quality of life of a
244.
by noxer 5y ago
I said "Does it really matter how much MORE harm it causes?" Context matters. The question was "does it matter if its 5% more or 10% more? (or any other number more)" The answer is: No, it does not matter, because its mo
245.
by noxer 5y ago
FBA does not require to know who your friends are you just need to know enough nodes. If some of the nodes are not your friend aka they lie to you, you would know as soon as they lie and you can simply stop listen to them. This however requ
246.
by noxer 5y ago
Don't know about Stellar but the original XRPL consensus which Stellar is based on requires each validator "node" (nodes that participate in consensus finding) to define which other nodes it listens to (This list of other nod
247.
by noxer 5y ago
Thats still not "tens of millions" and a huge portion of these will be caused by the measurement done in the name of fighting COVID. Either way smoking has killed more people each year for many years now than COVID + all pandemic
248.
by noxer 5y ago
I'm not filling in anything with assumption. The data we have is just rather minimal and incomplete. The 10% "assumption" was made for the sake of the example. Since we dont know the real percentage but we know its statistica
249.
by noxer 5y ago
The blockers aren't but the damage they can cause can be very permanent.
250.
by noxer 5y ago
>You want to make the choice for others, which is clearly worse. No I don't. But there is a consensus that certain people can not make such a decision i.e. kids and I think that is correct. I dont want to decide for them at all. I j
251.
by noxer 5y ago
Yes because if everyone has variant A and variant A provides some kind of immunity to variant B then there will be less reproduction of B and therefore the chance of mutation becomes lower even if B infect everyone at the same time too. But
252.
by noxer 5y ago
>Because this means tens of millions of more dead bodies. That implies there are tens of million dead bodies already but there aren't. There are maybe a few millions at most. From which only a part it accrual excess death and from t
253.
by noxer 5y ago
That depend on the plane and all kinds of external circumstances as well as how it is programmed etc. etc. But I can assure you even modern passenger plane on autopilot do not avoid crashes with other planes, buildings or ground (mountains
254.
by noxer 5y ago
I guess we assume word have meaning and are mostly understood by everyone according to the meanings or people dont understand the word at all if they never heard it. Assuming wide spread misinterpretation is a bit far fetched especially for
255.
by noxer 5y ago
That is correct and therefore the autopilot does automatic piloting which is obviously spectrum that can include more or less capabilities but certainly its not to be confuse with "autonomous piloting" or "self-driving/o
256.
by noxer 5y ago
Because the claim that people dont understand the word comes up in such threads. Other than that my post had nothing to do with the thread/article it was a reply to the parent post stating the claim.
257.
by noxer 5y ago
The goal should obviously be to end any violence at all and give people free choice. But AFAIK no decision they make fundamentally changes anything. Hormones, surgery etc. don't seem to solve anything statistically speaking. For exampl
258.
by noxer 5y ago
You dont have to be pilot or even remotely interested in aircraft to know the term. Its like "Blackbox" everyone with basic education has heard about it. >I bet for most people autopilot means computer does driving. That is the
259.
by noxer 5y ago
I didn't say anything about Tesla, I dont care about Tesla. The word was "Autopilot" and the claim was that people interpret the word wrong. There is zero evidence that this is the case. I've never talked to anyone who d
260.
by noxer 5y ago
Autopilot may be a marketing name and people can voice their opinion about it as not being appropriate or whatever but where did the notion come from that "Autopilot" means it works on its own without human? Autopilot is a term mo
261.
by noxer 5y ago
I think its supposed to be the off-site backup use case. If you can self-host in a different location you probably dont need it. On the other hand you can use any other service and encrypt your data first if you just need an off-site backup
262.
by noxer 5y ago
Its the classic we do whatever we want and if no one screams loud enough we move on. If they wanted to use the username they would do exactly the same.
263.
by noxer 5y ago
Not true, your data and/or content is the rent you pay.
264.
by noxer 5y ago
Check out coil.com Also who said content has to be written? If the demand for written paid content is low there is no way to fix this. Demand for stuff changes over time and certain business go obsolete. This has nothing to do with the topi
265.
by noxer 5y ago
None of these services can do what crypto can and you should not want to use them anyway. They take a cut, screw you over whenever possible, have zero respect for you privacy and personal data, can exclude you from service without due proce
266.
by noxer 5y ago
>Why have we all accepted this ridiculous situation? Because we use blockers? I hope yall do. >Isn't there a better solution? You decide what cookies you want to store. No one needs to aks you and you dont need to comply with any
267.
by noxer 5y ago
Paywalls are walled gardens even if I would want to use them I cant because the internet is global but paywalls are not. Beside that its not feasible as paywalls are usually a subscription, the average user would need to have 10-100 subscri
268.
by noxer 5y ago
Some kind of crypto IS necessary in the end. Not for the micropayment[1] itself but for funding/withdrawing. If this is done over traditional banking system it excludes half the world with access to the internet + adds fees that go to
269.
by noxer 5y ago
1) Why do people buy "pro" apps to remove ads but would not do that for content on the web? Also the micro fraud argument is kinda funny since everyone knows the ad business is full or fraud and everyone somehow involved with ads
270.
by noxer 5y ago
I case anyone is interested in the removed content > https://t.me/TrackerTrial

More ›