>You want to make the choice for others, which is clearly worse. No I don't. But there is a consensus that certain people can not make such a decision i.e. kid

>You want to make the choice for others, which is clearly worse. No I don't. But there is a consensus that certain people can not make such a decision i.e. kids and I think that is correct. I dont want to decide for them at all. I just pointed out who should not make the decision, a non-mature person who has a very limited view on the magnitude of the decision, has zero medical expertise on the topic and is possible in a very complicated mental and emotional state. I also pointed out that statistically speaking some strategies cause "collateral damage" and other don't. While each case has to be looked at individually one should not ignore the fact that contrarily to people wishes, no swift medical treatments are probably favorable. >You're also confused into thinking that the school is encouraging one option when the article doesn't even suggest that is happening. No. I'm not confused and that's not what I'm thinking or said. Beside that, separating people by letting them joining different alliances is an absurd way to prevent violence.