Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
notJim
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
48 ms
·
451.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
I really hope there's more than what we've seen so far. The videos I've seen have basically been debunked as visual artifacts, namely parallax which exaggerates the apparent speed, and artifacts from triangular apertures comm
452.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
no
453.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
I wrote a long post in reply to this, but HN lost it :( :( I feel that people are over-simplifying this issue greatly on both sides in this thread. Basically, it seems like the definition of GoF is not totally agreed upon even by top scient
454.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
Is it right to focus so much on entrepreneurship? Of course at the top, it matters a lot, but isn't a lot of mobility also driven by more average careers?
455.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
Is it a certainty that the lab was doing gain of function research? Haven't followed this closely.
456.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
> Why should someone "come out" as anything? > Why did he/she say that to me? Isn't this just the process of getting to know someone? As you get to know someone, you share more information about yourself. I think i
457.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
Do you have to have the watch with LTE, or does it actually cache music locally?
458.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
I'm not sure why it's so amazing that there are a bunch of local landlords profiting off people's need for shelter. Great for them that they get to get rich, but why is making sure rich people stay rich so important again? In
459.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
This appears to be the source given[1] for the claims https://www.snowbullcapital.com/tracking-tesla-job-postings . No idea what to make of this methodology, which appears to be based on tracking re-use of req ids. Someone m
460.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
> Eventually we ended up with a notion that everyone should go to college and this has been buttressed with government support but what if this idea is wrong? I think the problem with this line of thinking is that since the US is a highl
461.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
This is maybe a ridiculous question, but why is that so much better? If someone is able to live cheaply, why is it better for them to work in some menial, low-wage job versus being supported by a relative? I think something you have to cons
462.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
It's true, there are no tech people driving Teslas or late model luxury cars. As you say, there is universal agreement with you, because your opinion is the objective truth.
463.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
I think with Tesla the only subscription is "premium connectivity", which is basically a cell data plan. The car works fine without it. Even the nav will still use traffic data for routing, it just won't visualize it for you.
464.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
Do you have any evidence for these claims? This just feels like luddism to me.
465.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
> things that seem so obviously safer are taken without question as better, but in many cases, such features really only provide a false sense of security along with substantive unintended consequences This is not true at all. There is d
466.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
A used Chevy Spark EV may be exactly what you need: https://www.edmunds.com/used-chevrolet-spark-ev/ . If you can boost budget a bit, you can probably a used Leaf or similar.
467.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
+1 on feature flags. Set up your flags so you can disable features for certain customers, or groups/classes of customers. Delivery and release can then be separated. Release frequently, deliver features when it makes sense. Also recomm
468.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
Way more than Montana, which has only .3% of the US population, though Norrland and Montana are similar in absolute numbers.
469.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
Low rates are effectively a demand-side subsidy for housing I think, similar to other policies. But as you point out, if you restrict the supply-side, demand-side subsidy can be counter-productive.
470.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
What does it feel like? And have you tried to mitigate confirmation bias at all? I'm just curious, bc I work in a small office.
471.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
A lot of these videos have already been debunked as being visual artifacts from the cameras or parallax. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le7Fqbsrrm8
472.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
> I've seen it do amazingly well in the rain at night Not anymore, since they removed the radar. Rain seems to really interfere with the vision based system, and apparently auto high beams are required at night, and they flash const
473.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
Isn't Amazon famous for clawing back starting bonuses if you don't stay for 4 years or something like that?
474.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
You have to agree to it before you take delivery of the vehicle. You can cancel it if you don't like this issue. (I know because I am in this situation.)
475.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
> Most Americans never leave their hometown This can't possibly be right. Maybe they never move away , but never leave a radius of 200 miles from their home town? Do you have a cite for that?
476.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
I've been following the situation via a few Youtube folks with non-Tesla charging, and I think your description is a bit exaggerated for the US, but not entirely. It seems like many routes (not all though) along interstates have enough
477.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
I'm a socialist, but I hate this meme on the left. We simply do not have time to build socialism before tackling climate change, especially with the recent crushing defeats the left has suffered in Western countries. We have to do this
478.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
You are misinterpreting what people are saying. I searched for "uninhabitable", and the comment you're referring to says particular places will be uninhabitable. Not the world. This is true, according to scientific predicti
479.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
Who is saying all is lost and that the world will be uninhabitable? People are saying bad things will happen, potentially catastrophic things for those directly affected. Some of these things may create large social challenges. What's
480.
▲
by
notJim
5y ago
It kind of seems like this article is saying that if we (in 1989) slow global warming by the year 2000, the worst effects of sea level rise will not happen. It's not saying that those effects will happen in the year 2000. My understa
More ›