Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
noondip
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
The definition of veganism is, a way of living which seeks to exclude, as far as is possible and practicable, all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose. It's not about pursuing some i
32.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
It seems to me, you deny objective ethics when it conveniently justifies your behavior. Only a very sad and miserable person must beg for an explanation as to why inflicting suffering is wrong. Perhaps you are yourself trapped in a cycle of
33.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
> I love when big agriculture pays for studies to protect corporate interests. This appears to be the actual study - https://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0034-1389991 - I don't see any author di
34.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
You've explained the inherent problem I believe to be facing humanity today - apathy and lack of empathy. We can't accept violence if we want to live in a free and peaceful society. All oppression has to eventually fall by the way
35.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
There are victims which suffer as a consequence of your actions. I think that makes it clear the behavior is unethical. If "I want to" were all the justification needed, the world would be an even more terrible place to live. We w
36.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
If you want to be hyperbolic, then yes - if the whole world went vegan today, hundreds of billions of animals would be without "purpose". However, the reality is, we breed these animals into captivity, and as less demand for the
37.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
This might come as a big shock, but grass-fed farming operations are in fact less sustainable and worse for the environment than even factory farming. I really recommend you check out the documentary Cowspiracy (it's available on NetFl
38.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
> Why do I have to give eating salmon any thought? The same reason you would give thought to killing a Golden Retriever for food. Due to indoctrinated beliefs, people think it's alright to kill certain animals for food, but not othe
39.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Non-human animal activities should not provide a logical or moral foundation for our behavior and it is illogical to claim that we should eat the same diet they do, especially as most of them are obligatory carnivores killing for survival,
40.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Beriberi is a nutritional deficit in vitamin B1, not protein, which is ironically easily remedied with potatoes.
41.
▲
New study says Paleo diet 'unhealthy and fattening' angering ardent devotees
(telegraph.co.uk)
3 points
by
noondip
11y ago
|
6 comments
42.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
So you mean to say the mass production of corn and soy as animal feed is not an example of crop monoculture? Also, how do vegans "kill wild animals" - and are you so sure they do so in numbers of over 150 billion per year, as does
43.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Exactly who stands to gain from a vegan agenda, do you think? Big Broccoli? Dr. Greger Super Pills Inc.?
44.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Check out videos about fish oil supplements on http://nutritionfacts.org . I took them for a while, but have since realized algae oil is a much safer source of EPA-DHA. Even krill oil would be an improvement.
45.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Lots of quackery here. http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info:d... > no statements can be made whether the poorer health in vegetarians in our study is caused by their dietary habit or if they co
46.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
> All food may have protein, but all food does not have essential amino acids (which cannot be made by your body) in the quantities required to maintain health. > the idea you can get sufficient protein by just eating any old plant is
47.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Oh, come on - you don't really think so, do you? How many people do you know with diabetes as a result of eating potatoes or mangoes? Check out Starch Solution by John McDougall, if you're being serious. Here's a small tidbit
48.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Deficient means there are lower levels of certain amino acids, but they're not missing entirely. It wouldn't make any biological sense for plants to be missing amino acids. If you read the actual cited source, you will find this:
49.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
> it's possible to eat plants and end up not getting all essential amino acids No, that isn't possible. You could eat nothing but potatoes, or even mangoes, and still get enough protein. There isn't a single whole plant fo
50.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
As I had explained in the parent comment, all food has protein, so it's not necessary to specially source it from a particular food. Especially when that food appears extremely unpalatable (or am I the only one who doesn't salivat
51.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Okay, but human nutritional needs only call for 10-15% of calories from protein. Why would you go for 70%? There are risks associated with excessive protein consumption, too.
52.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
> The tiny insects have been eaten in developing nations for centuries, but now consumers in the Western world are increasingly accepting them as an efficient and sustainable source of protein. Every food has protein in it. Bananas have
53.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
For example - most of the world's population is actually lactose intolerant.
54.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
There isn't any problem with naturally occurring sugar in fruit. The trouble comes when there's added sugar only.
55.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Here's a brief guide for setting up SSH with YubiKey as a smartcard which complements this article nicely - https://github.com/drduh/YubiKey-Guide
56.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
It's generally believed and accepted all animals are sentient.
57.
▲
Avastium RCE
(code.google.com)
4 points
by
noondip
11y ago
|
0 comments
58.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
I didn't realize science expired after N years. Should we disregard the theory of gravity, too? I mean, it's quite old! Your first two sources (NHS & Choose My Plate) are literally government/industry propaganda, so aren&
59.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
> there is almost nobody currently saying sugar and complex carbs are good for you, everyone is saying to limit your intake Who is saying to limit intake of carbs? Definitely not any non-profit organization like WHO: > The Consultatio
60.
▲
by
noondip
11y ago
Well, since you've asked so politely! An insulin index of foods: the insulin demand generated by 1000-kJ portion of common foods http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/66/5/1264.abstract
More ›