3 ms·
Because the federal government’s footprint is not it’s workforce. Domain of influence, spending, etc. Has the spending increased? Do we have more programs? Hav
by nonethewiser 7d ago
Because the federal government’s footprint is not it’s workforce. Domain of influence, spending, etc.
Has the spending increased? Do we have more programs? Have more string been attached to state funding? Are there more executive orders?
- margalabargala 7d agoSo basically the original comment was correct, you agree it was correct, but you're deliberately misunderstanding it because they didn't hedge their.claim rigorously enough for your agenda. You should consider reviewing the HN comment guidelines.
- nonethewiser 6d agoThe original comment was not correct. The federal government has not shrunk. Further comments revealed that they conflated federal government with federal workforce which is clearly false. Are executive orders part have the federal government? Has that gone up? Is federal spending part of the federal government? Has that gone up?
- margalabargala 6d agoExactly, you understand that they used "federal government" to mean "federal workforce", yet for some reason are trying to start a fight about it. Consider learning some communication skills.