neya

11 ms·

181.
by neya 6mo ago
Sure, I admit I wasn't aware the alternate caps was even a thing in the guideline. If you go into my comment history further, I've done it way more times, but never been flagged before (which is why I wasn't aware it was agai
182.
by neya 6mo ago
:)))))) laughed hard at that one. Wish HN had smiley support.
183.
by neya 6mo ago
Rule #1: Never trust a company with "Open" in only their name and is anything but, in real.
184.
by neya 6mo ago
I unfortunately took part in their startup program. I was awarded the credits. However, I noticed that everything was super pricey, especially the AI services and the azure interface is basically garbage. It is very easy for you to enable a
185.
by neya 6mo ago
I personally use tool calling for APIs, so really not sure (I don't use agents.md per se, I directly stuff info into the context window)
186.
by neya 6mo ago
> Focus on what tool the LLM requires to do its work in the best way. I completely agree with you. There was a recent finding that said Agents.md outperforms skills. I'm old school and I actually see best results by just directly fe
187.
by neya 6mo ago
So, are you also going to do anything about the top comment being fake news? It literally says something completely that is not true. Minus the "sneering", I think the validity of my comment remains.
188.
by neya 6mo ago
Is your source code worth only $40 for them to train their models on? https://www.techradar.com/pro/bad-news-skeptics-github-says-...
189.
by neya 6mo ago
I guess it's access to Gemini, because that's the plan I'm on and you can access Gemini using gemini.google.com or their phone app (Android/iOS). I couldn't find information on the API, maybe it's on that page,
190.
by neya 6mo ago
I guess if you choose the business standard, you get "Pro access to features & models with enterprise-grade security & privacy" https://knowledge.workspace.google.com/admin/getting-started...
191.
by neya 6mo ago
Absolutely.
192.
by neya 6mo ago
The catch: If you don't pay any subscriptions to Google, they will use your data for training their models. Agreed on competition being good.
193.
by neya 6mo ago
Yeah, in most threads you will see anyone recommending Gemini be downvoted. Ironically, Gemini (with Workspace subscription) is the only model that explicitly states it doesn't use your inputs to train their models right under the chat
194.
by neya 6mo ago
I pay for Google Workspace, so pretty much the Gemini Pro included with that suffices my use case. I can't say it will work for everyone, but I do use it for random tasks - all the way from wood working to building complex software pro
195.
by neya 6mo ago
Thanks, been meaning to try it. I heard the limits on that is an issue and people are supposedly blowing the limits off way too easily? How has your experience been so far in this regard?
196.
by neya 6mo ago
> not a professional software engineer I think this is where we might have differing opinions. I'm a CTO by profession and I know what bad code is, so it is quite easy for me, based on my professional experience, point out when Clau
197.
by neya 6mo ago
Claude is good, I'm definitely not saying it's bad. But if you work with LiveView, it will tend to choose more complexity over simplicity. Weirdly enough I have a feeling it's trained more on Python/Ruby (Object oriented
198.
by neya 6mo ago
Been my experience as well, but generally the anti-Google sentiment here is pretty loud so you'll never see anyone praising Gemini here pretty much
199.
by neya 6mo ago
Anecdotally, I would actually argue tbe opposite - Anthropic is overrated, ass-kissed way too much here for mediocre coding abilities (especially for Elixir). ChatGPT most of the time one-shots complex solutions in comparison. The only reas
200.
by neya 6mo ago
How else will they earn ad revenue? /s
201.
by neya 6mo ago
> A competent developer could whip up a more axios-like library with fetch in a day easily. Then you would have created just an axios clone. AKA re-inventing the wheel. The issue isn't the library itself, but rather the fact that i
202.
by neya 6mo ago
Thanks!
203.
by neya 6mo ago
Hi, sorry, just new to this entire story, could you please share light on the fake audits? Trying to understand what exactly happened.
204.
by neya 6mo ago
Honestly, I think if anything, we need an app to replace the dealers. Every other problem might evaporate (albeit not completely) if this is addressed. Dealerships are the largest extortionist racket in the car market IMO.
205.
by neya 6mo ago
I completely agree with all the points made. It is 100% less likely for one to get ripped off buying used cars - mostly because I think you can skip the dealers in this process. The problem is the dealers and their insane markups. Maybe bad
206.
by neya 6mo ago
Honestly used car salesmen are far worse and should be replaced by AI too
207.
by neya 6mo ago
> their evidence is just stronger than yours. What evidence? There is 0 evidence. It's deployed to production, but that doesn't mean it works fine or is free of bugs - which is exactly my point and why you use algorithms for th
208.
by neya 6mo ago
> which is to experiment with agents I think you completely missed the point - they built a product purely using agents and deployed it to production for others to use. Read what the product actually does first.
209.
by neya 6mo ago
This is the wrong way to do it. As software architects, you need to learn to appropriate the correct usage of algorithms and AI. Using AI for building everything is not just a waste of tokens, it also is an exercise in futility. Here is how
210.
by neya 6mo ago
Home page boldly claims: EuRopE dOeS iT BeTtEr. There is literally a story trending on HN right now: Proton built Proton Meet to escape the CLOUD Act. They built it on CLOUD Act infrastructure. Their website promises "n

More ›