2 ms·

> which is to experiment with agents I think you completely missed the point - they built a product purely using agents and deployed it to production for other

• gchamonlive 6mo ago
  Why shouldn't they ship it to production if the experiment was a success? You say the only way to code is to "learn to appropriate the correct usage of algorithms and AI" which for you is to code a generator and only use "dumb" generators to produce code, which is fine, but they just showed that for 20 bucks and a few minutes you can get very far, so their evidence is just stronger than yours.
  • neya 6mo ago
    > their evidence is just stronger than yours. What evidence? There is 0 evidence. It's deployed to production, but that doesn't mean it works fine or is free of bugs - which is exactly my point and why you use algorithms for these types of things. They're testable, repeatable and scalable. With LLM slop it's just that - slop.
    • gchamonlive 6mo ago
      Have you seen the code to write it off as slop?