Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
necovek
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
I'd suggest you look at it as funny and not annoying: IKEA in London, being a very multicultural place, likely has many non-native English speakers as well! When all else fails, you can always go back to the basic international languag
92.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
I am commenting without researching this tool deeper than the original README, because I am curious about the answers from the author — before I invest in researching it. I did not see them answered in the README That's what discussion
93.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
Thanks for the lesson on what each of those technologies is: are you claiming they cannot be used to achieve the effect of disallowing access to a filesystem area for a process (like an agent)? They have different default behavior (and leve
94.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
Your local development machine will have the source code or images or IaaC configuration that you push to GH/AWS — a rogue agent can just modify that and wait for you to authorize the next push. I'd also consider short-lived token
95.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
I guess you missed my "containerisation" point: if not restricted, every rogue package or agent has access to your full $HOME too. A secret is there to protect access to data you care about. If that data is there, well, not much a
96.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
There isn't, which is exactly the point: we do not yet understand the fundamentals behind reasoning.
97.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
While this might be a useful tool for Mac users, it's all hackers here, so: * Most people do not have passwords in plain text — an SSH key protected with a passphrase is not "plain text", for instance * Most people have encry
98.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
As I mentioned elsewhere, eg. femur can take at least 30x body weight, and we've got two to carry us. If a giant is 10x the size, and femur is just scaled linearly, even with 10x the relative weight, it can still take 3x giant's
99.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
I believe this real Sean Byrne should move into Sligo for a while, just to spice it up a little. Then they can also ask to be removed from the list as the person on the list.
100.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
Regarding 1, horses in particular are known to jump off two hind legs and land on their two forelegs, putting a lot more force on them than their stationary weight. On 2, I believe that's the GP's point too — human leg bones (or h
101.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
In general, the argument holds some water, but it ignores the fact that human bones can take a lot more than their own weight today — depending, obviously, on how they are stressed (they can probably take maximum force along their lengthwis
102.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
I agree and believe revocation is the most important problem. With services requiring it, you can just not use them: as long as it does not get mandated (unfortunately, a direction we are heading in), hopefully market self-regulates and pri
103.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
The problem with that is that it leaks too much information to anyone seeing it — this is bad if it needs to be used with any party you might not trust (or not trust their security). Serbia (former Yugoslavia) already does something similar
104.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
There are people whose birth date is not really known (babies left at doorsteps, people from war-torn countries with no official record who had no parents to tell them of their birth date...). I do not know how are they handled, but they pr
105.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
I wonder if they'll mention anywhere how many parameters Kimi3 has? Oh, they did it around 5 times in the first 5 paragraphs? How did I miss it?
106.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
Let's also note that they did say "25 years ago". UX research then and now was, at the very least, different, and there was less experience with web-specific behaviour. I'd also note that it was mostly graphic designers
107.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
Unfortunately, there are already techniques that track you through static elements on a page (think tracking pixels, but any resource load is sufficient). Considering the money in advertising on the internet, if web moved to more of a conte
108.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
I got you, but I believe a lot of the ground rules that would be in effect would make sense: a good SDLC — one that I was part of since ~20 years ago — with automated CI/CD, IaaC, reviews, constrained change requests, architectural pro
109.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
I absolutely agree a good product team should be able to: it seems I never ran into one, though. It is not rocket science, but I had one too many "quick projects" thrown my way by the product teams that were 3+ months of dedicated
110.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
Uhm, I wasn't under the impression this was Wikipedia: look for "FAANG interviews" at Google.com or Kagi.com or.... (I am not sure what part you want to challenge, so getting a better response is really hard — if it's al
111.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
In regards to (software) architects being regulated, the problem was always going to be that someone can jump in and build a "skyscraper" in their room/garage — and they have! I honestly have failed to see the value of anyone
112.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
This is why I believe true engineering art comes in actually marrying all three: build great quality quickly at reasonable (small) cost! If you need it to work for at least a month or two (instead of one and done, which some demoware is lik
113.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
You actually do. All of those puzzle-style questions of the sort of "how many liters of water in Mediterranean" ask you to develop a solution with a vague requirement by leveraging what you know roughly to demonstrate you can spe
114.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
Product should, definitely, run user research along with Product Design. But what I find is that people in either have a problem imagining a solution that's a couple of orders of magnitude easier to build, but also much easier for our
115.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
Since there were no public domain images to use, it was deemed more ecological to generate one with AI than fly a reporter to Sao Paolo and snap a few photos.
116.
▲
by
necovek
2mo ago
IANAL but I'd guess copyright infringion: unauthorized (re)distribution of copyrighted content.
117.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Is it? I believe it is fair to hope so and even expect it, but this has been promised as being just around the corner for 10+ years. Yet here we are, still driving our own cars, and laughing at silly behavior of most advanced self-driving s
118.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
One of the hits I got was https://www.networkworld.com/article/665211/byod-mac-users-p... — so Linux users obviously pay even more when they are interested ;) My point being that this is a bit niche, and overall t
119.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Plenty of languages are rich with boilerplate (think Java, C++...). Expressing intent succinctly is non-trivial, and especially so when you want to provide a rich vocabulary like modern languages do. While modern tooling helps, the form of
120.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Regarding reviewing commit-by-commit, I actually do believe a branch is a unit of work to be reviewed, as long as it is fully standalone and implements a usecase end-to-end (no matter how small, and small it should be). Commits on a branch
More ›