Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
necovek
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
121.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
As I mentioned, this is similar to a workflow we used at Canonical ~15 years ago with bzr-pipeline plugin for bzr. Except that you tried not to divide it by technical aspect (DB changes vs API vs frontend) bit instead into smaller, semantic
122.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
I dislike them reinforcing the component approach to delivering work through their examples, like the top screenshot showing "database schema changes", "api changes" and "frontend implementation" as separate br
123.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
I went with a multi-split central AC: despite the higher cost, it is generally a usability mess. You can only run one mode for all rooms, and while that sounds reasonable, I have one tiny storage room that houses my old dual Xeon heater, wh
124.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Not in US, but on top of no room for air ducts, running long copper lines (for both mini split and multi-split units) tends to be expensive (price of copper). You also need to guide condensation out, so either downward piping or (expensive)
125.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Does the radiant heat not increase the room temperature, thus affecting the indoor temp sensor? Combining that input with outdoor temperature (and whole weather stations) is totally done. Similarly, floor heating systems measure temperature
126.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
There are always 12-page tutorials to do it: good ol'e search engines should be able to bring one up!
127.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Overpriced for the value provided, especially with the pay-as-you-go rates for enterprises; but also in stock prices. Pricing a product is generally about ensuring a profit on investment, but also a good RoI for your customers (or they will
128.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
I would say that creativity is crucial to a good , working compromise. You do not need much creativity for a bad one (it sounds like you are focusing on that type of compromise). I am not saying that the "original" definition
129.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
I do not think anyone disagrees with that — ideally, you get two ideas to meet and satisfy them completely (or two people to agree on the solution working for them both). But even a new idea comes from someone , and you might still have e
130.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Some might actually say that they found "a perfect compromise" where both use-cases are served well — this seems to be very much a linguistic preference today, regardless of the fact that "compromise" originally came
131.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
You are obviously using a newly defined phrase "mutual preference" which does not seem to be familiar to most people and a quick search does not bring anything of value for me (there is "mutual preference method", but th
132.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Does not your entire comment rely on a very particular ("original") definition of the word compromise — so, uhm, on "choice of words"?
133.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
I believe people are focusing on that because that's a traditional meaning of the word — Merriam-Webster uses "concession" in 2 out of 3 definitions. I would say that an impersonal "compromise" was more of a figure
134.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Compromise is one technique in doing optimization: as someone mentioned, you could be maximizing a known good property of your product with no ill-effects on any other property. But you might be optimizing an overall experience for two nee
135.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
I disagree, we are faced with "true dilemmas" every day numerous times, not even limited to work and creation — e.g. you might be going to a shop to buy crackers, and while you have a preferred brand, a new entrant might be half t
136.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
We are talking here about someone at least technically savvy who would know if they are of interest or not (ok, maybe not). They'd also be able to monitor their outgoing traffic. We are also not talking about a potential Russian produ
137.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
That is certainly a different matter: "handing over domestic surveillance" vs enabling a foreign company to run a node on your network. However, that is mostly about trusting or not trusting someone's business. Eg. DJI drones
138.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Being more comfortable with a foreign company compared to a domestic one does not suggest you should be comfortable with either ;)
139.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
As an — I am guessing — American, you should feel more comfortable with handing over your domestic surveillance to Russia or China than to a US-based company. They absolutely have no interest in your domestic matters, nor do they have a c
140.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Before LLMs, "organizations" have seen code review as multiple things: * Share knowledge about a particular area of the codebase between multiple people * Share overall engineering knowledge between the parties in the review
141.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
> China has never been one to care much about things like ethics or safety. While the west worries about climate change, China burns more coal than ever before. China uses more energy than ever before, but out of big systems, they are ea
142.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Yes, but the point is that getting to a different representation from a natural one (eg. binary one with computers or a decimal one for human use) is going to have some "external" overhead which is likely to negate the savings. Ye
143.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
A transit system has a different cost and is actually paid for by majority of users: the fact that few abuse it is not going to break it (as long as we keep it immoral to do so — note that there may be valid reasons to do it, when someone i
144.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
You mean like those guaranteed-always-compresses-by-at-least-one-bit algorithm patents gzip page made fun of? In your case, doing prime factoring is where the cost would be, wouldn't it?
145.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Uhm, I am pretty sure kids do not require signed permission to go on a field with their friends and play basketball or football (either the European or American... or Australian one :). And you are likely to not even find out about it unles
146.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
He has a daughter and thus does not want to worry about her online well-being yet (see article). But I believe that's misplaced, because she will be vulnerable as an adult, and there was never a way to produce encryption which was not
147.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
As long as you have a computer that can run unsigned software, or software signed by yourself, this won't come to Linux as non-optional features: you can always recompile your kernel removing things you do not want like this.
148.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
Measure the change in full case electric resistance? Though I think it would be very small :)
149.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
People are different: my hands are big and on my preferred laptop sizes (13-14"), laptop edges cut into my palms when my fingers are on the home row. Others' anatomy might be different in other ways. Perhaps you could claim I shou
150.
▲
by
necovek
3mo ago
FWIW, I read their joke differently: you were the one who said "only 1.2%", and they turned that on you by asking for you to part ways with "only 1.2%" of your net worth. They are not questioning money exchange, they are
More ›