mythz

64 ms·

811.
by mythz 7y ago
Where's the info about the free CDN?
812.
by mythz 7y ago
So you can't search for `traceroute` or `tracert` directly but you can search for misspelling like `tracerout` and the results page just ends up showing the search results for `traceroute` so it's not exactly a very sophisticated
813.
by mythz 7y ago
Spend your efforts on reading the docs instead, as repeatedly mentioned in my comments and all docs, the purpose of the projects is to compare against C#'s 101 LINQ Examples - that's the entire purpose of the series, which is what
814.
by mythz 7y ago
How is this too hard for you get? The examples show how different languages implement each of C#'s 101 LINQ Examples . You shouldn't need any charitable explanation or imagination to be able to read the title and purpose of each
815.
by mythz 7y ago
Of course the Expression's AST generated by the C# compiler is analyzed at runtime, how else could it be done?
816.
by mythz 7y ago
Parsed by who, the C# compiler? I'm not aware of anything that generates C#'s Expression AST from a string, other than a C# Compiler. You can use Roslyn in code, but that's using the C# compiler in process.
817.
by mythz 7y ago
It's not a standard, they're extension methods on IEnumerable<T> in the System.Linq namespace, extension methods anyone could write and use instead. The "idiosyncratic special syntax" you're referring to is ca
818.
by mythz 7y ago
Your entire comment suggests you didn't bother to read the project docs? These are Microsoft's MSDN C# 101 LINQ Examples, I did not write the C# LINQ Examples, Microsoft did, to show how to use LINQ. The languages are a comparison
819.
by mythz 7y ago
...and zero for the inverse, which is why Expression Trees are generated by the C# compiler at compile time, not decompiled at runtime.
820.
by mythz 7y ago
Both these expressions return the same result in both C# and JavaScript: 0.1 + 0.1 == 0.2; //= true 0.1 + 0.2 == 0.3; //= false It's not the language, it's https://floating-point-gui.de
821.
by mythz 7y ago
It's a compile time, not a runtime feature. It can't be implemented at runtime, if your method is passed an opaque compiled delegate, it's not possible for the .NET Runtime to deconstruct its pre-compiled AST. If your method
822.
by mythz 7y ago
I've no idea what you mean? LINQ is a "Language-Integrated Query" for the C# and VB.NET languages which built upon a number of features in .NET Framework v3.5 to make possible. It shipped with a "LINQ to Objects", &
823.
by mythz 7y ago
PR's are welcome! I wrote the Clojure examples 6 years ago as a beginner whilst I was learning Clojure but I thought its built in functions were already well suited for LINQ examples. Do you have an example where transducers would help
824.
by mythz 7y ago
I'm the author of 2 such LINQ providers that rewrite expression trees for execution in different remote persistent providers: - OrmLite https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack.OrmLite (C# POCO ORM) - PocoDyna
825.
by mythz 7y ago
As LINQ has been positioned as one of C#/.NET's biggest strengths their 101 LINQ Examples are a nice set of simple code examples to compare how well different languages fare against each other: - Swift https://github.co
826.
by mythz 7y ago
As stated clearly in the README: > P.S. I moved actix-net and actix-web project to my personal github account. So he's transferred it to: https://github.com/fafhrd91/actix-web Feel free to fork, take a copy, st
827.
by mythz 7y ago
Yeah Python is a clear powerhouse on the server, but as its weak a target in browsers & mobiles I didn't list it as a candidate for end-to-end development.
828.
by mythz 7y ago
It may not have the popularity but it has a well resourced technical team behind its development resulting in the Dart VM being a highly tuned technically brilliant piece of engineering. It has great support for server scenarios like gRPC [
829.
by mythz 7y ago
Yeah they're mentions because it's being done in small niches (there's also Ruby/Haxe + many other transpile to JS languages), I just think they'll always lag behind the other popular and well supported contenders l
830.
by mythz 7y ago
Pretty clear signal that there's low appetite for full stack development in Swift. What are other promising future "end-to-end" (i.e. Web / Server / Mobile) development platforms are there? IMO these are the main co
831.
by mythz 7y ago
Happy to see them succeed as a successful bootstrapped company who are operating on a sustainable business model that allows them to continue iterating and improving their already best-of-class products better with each release. Jet Brains
832.
by mythz 7y ago
There's not a lot you can do except be super mindful about where you spend your time and try to optimize your time management as much as you can. You basically can't waste any time, even the "time breaks" during work I a
833.
by mythz 7y ago
I'm trying to compare hosting costs across hosting providers, not at the creating VM's stage. I expected to be able to work out determine costs from their pricing page, which wasn't clear. But I've since been referred to
834.
by mythz 7y ago
As stated I'm only trying to get a comparison of the cost for the very popular use-case of running a "Website 24/7 for 12 months". I use this simple basic core metric as a baseline for comparing hosting costs amongst dif
835.
by mythz 7y ago
I'm not familiar with GCP, what's the difference between Price vs Preemptible price vs Commitment Price? and where did you get the Commitment Pricing from?
836.
by mythz 7y ago
I'm not a fan of manual inefficiencies of AWS's Reserved Pricing but at least their pricing is clear. I see all these different prices being floated around but I'm still not clear on how much GCP's compute cost for the m
837.
by mythz 7y ago
Trying to find out how much cheaper these new E2 instances are, these are the Monthly prices taken from their Compute Pricing page [1]: Machine type VCPUs Memory Price Preemptible price n1-standard-2 2 7.5GB $48.55 $14.60
838.
by mythz 7y ago
>Before AWS it took thousands of people and billions in capital investment to do so. WhatsApp Stats (2014): - 450 million active users, and reached that number faster than any other company in history. - 50 billion messages every day acr
839.
by mythz 7y ago
Underwhelming, even without the glass demo fail. Looks like it was designed by an outsourced rogue design team trying to design an 80's sci-fi car for kicks, that somehow it made it to production. The demo was lacking in interior, tech
840.
by mythz 7y ago
Your bias is showing with your "brand fanboys/amateur investors" slurs. Their P/E is an irrelevant measure for AMD's market value, as it was for AMZN when they were aiming for 0 profit and re-invest everything towar

More ›