mythz

65 ms·

841.
by mythz 7y ago
It's unfortunate, but I'd consider it a feature that you're not able to sign in without access to the physical devices linked to your 2FA account, i.e. it shouldn't be possible for someone with access to your Email accou
842.
by mythz 7y ago
> Right now there's this trend where companies take the benefits of open source for themselves, then toss aside the open source community when it looks like it might make them a buck The narrative you're trying to paint is misl
843.
by mythz 7y ago
Which is both clearly spelled out in the article and irrelevant to my original comment where "Nothing about this announcement makes it closed-source software." Being licensed under an OSI approved license (that their software conv
844.
by mythz 7y ago
It not being recognized as an official OSI license does not make it "closed source", their source code is still fully and freely available to customers who can continue to using and customizing their own modified versions as they
845.
by mythz 7y ago
As they state in their article it's eventually OSS (after 3yrs it converts to OSS) and you're basically unaffected you're reselling a competing hosted version, you still have full access to the source code and can continue to
846.
by mythz 7y ago
Nothing about this announcement makes it closed-source software.
847.
by mythz 7y ago
> 1) that is the very definition of hyperbole. Exaggeration for effect. Using the word "countless" to describe one of the leading causes of deaths is not close to a valid example of hyberbolic exaggeration. > 2) I'm not
848.
by mythz 7y ago
> Calling something countless is hyperbolic exaggeration. I wasn't expecting an exact number. I also was not expecting hyperbole. It's not a hyperbolic to use "countless" when it's one of the top 10 causes of dea
849.
by mythz 7y ago
I hope their analytics show how many user engagements their losing by trying to force Sign Up before anyone can evaluate it.
850.
by mythz 7y ago
> >countless people > We've got very accurate counts. Pointless rebuttal, the exact number isn't relevant, nor easily quoted as the number of deaths per day, month, year is fluid, evident as you've made no attempt to
851.
by mythz 7y ago
and? it's not worth doing unless every life can be saved? The point is thousands of people die per day at the hands of human drivers. The sooner we can transition to autonomous vehicles, the sooner they'll start saving lives.
852.
by mythz 7y ago
aka anti-vaxxer logic, anecdotes > real world stats. There are ~1.25 million car deaths per year (20-50 million injured or disabled), a lot of room for "progress" to save countless lives.
853.
by mythz 7y ago
Maybe Douglas Crockford [1] knows JS well enough not to use it on content-only websites - instead prefers using clean semantic minimal markup that will work on every browser. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Cr
854.
by mythz 7y ago
Here's a Lisp that's whitespace sensitive to avoid parens: http://dustycloud.org/blog/wisp-lisp-alternative/ Other techniques to make them less prominent is to use a text face or syntax highlighting to m
855.
Script Unity from an In-Game Lisp REPL(sharpscript.net)
4 points by mythz 7y ago|0 comments
856.
by mythz 7y ago
How much of "writing an OS from scratch" do you think you could've done within 1 year using all the tutorials available on the Internet? Please provide links to some of these magic tutorials that makes developing an OS from
857.
by mythz 7y ago
Basically this is the UI FX used to build https://scatter.im Best way to view a preview of it: https://youtu.be/9D6eWP4peYM?t=113
858.
by mythz 7y ago
Just downloaded Unity to quickly check that it's possible, which ended up being pretty easy to enable. I've documented how to add Lisp scripting to an existing project at: https://sharpscript.net/lisp/unity H
859.
by mythz 7y ago
Never tried, but it's available in .NET Standard 2.0 + .NET v4.5 builds which has run everywhere I've tried that supports either of those target frameworks, e.g. have also been able to add scripting to an Xamarin.Android App.
860.
#Script Lisp(sharpscript.net)
88 points by mythz 7y ago|10 comments
861.
by mythz 7y ago
You need to execute well, but you also need to be working on the "right idea" for it to become successful. The simple core ideas behind Dropbox and AirBnB were seemingly disregarded by many devs and investors when first pitched, b
862.
by mythz 7y ago
That’s about the opposite experience that I’ve had, they’ve always been quick to respond and resolve my reported issues, they’ve even created tickets themselves when I’ve reported them over Twitter.
863.
by mythz 7y ago
I bought the SE for my kid ($149 on Amazon) as he was getting frustrated when using my old iPhone 4 which was slow and unresponsive. He absolutely loves it and I'm kind of jealous of how small, lightweight and portable it is vs my iPho
864.
by mythz 7y ago
Definitely worthwhile, thanks. I had viewed this presentation before but didn't know about the Speaker notes.
865.
by mythz 7y ago
clear cookies or go incognito
866.
by mythz 7y ago
Not in Rust, but that's my approach with .NET Core Desktop Apps: https://docs.servicestack.net/netcore-windows-desktop It also supports a super bloat-free option where entire Desktop Apps can be run from Gists. All App
867.
by mythz 7y ago
Sure, you shouldn't use anything you don't feel comfortable with. That clause is common in other commercial Software license agreements, e.g. Xamarin originally had the same clause before they were acquired. IMO it's a good d
868.
by mythz 7y ago
> It says all products are restricted as stated there. It does not say this, it says: > Licensee is granted a right to use the Software for small projects and evaluation purposes without charge provided that use of the Software is wi
869.
by mythz 7y ago
You're referring to different things where you've quoted me out of context [1], and have omitted where I've specifically said that only the commercial products have free usage quotas [2]. All the packages I've listed do
870.
by mythz 7y ago
Right they'd approve the commercial license just as they would with every other commercial product they're using. > which is probably in the same order of magnitude of likeliness as the AGPLv3 It's disingenuous to claim th

More ›