muyuu

18 ms·

361.
by muyuu 4y ago
next time I'm spastic I'll tell my wife I'm actually working in my next project
362.
by muyuu 4y ago
you are having a good laugh if you think the average granny is going to do that anytime soon
363.
by muyuu 4y ago
Yea in a sense it will be a win, but it will up the stakes. A lot of people with get scammed. A lot more than right now.
364.
by muyuu 4y ago
I'm half way there, I already have no mates and I ignore most of the email from work.
365.
by muyuu 4y ago
spam and especially phishing will become much, much better it will be hard to trust anything at all
366.
by muyuu 4y ago
I don't know if it's only first-generation, the jury will be out on that one for a long time, perhaps many generations there is a clear pattern, which Dawkins seems to embody, that new atheists are MORE religious than their parent
367.
by muyuu 4y ago
yep, even better in unmaintained consoles, where the popular demand for concrete binaries is pretty much set in stone and you can even aim to complete the entire library of software binaries over time - as they're usually in the hundre
368.
by muyuu 4y ago
> It makes me sad to see a part of our shared culture destroyed like this. Reminds of me of the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas by the Taliban; this time because some people have no taste. like that, if those Buddhas had been privatel
369.
by muyuu 4y ago
yea for recreational computing nobody is trying to bring back C64 compatibility as a practical platform though, they are working on emulators and in the legacy machines themselves I love the C64 demo scene myself, it was my main introductio
370.
by muyuu 4y ago
> Ok, so they want to unify the world by killing everyone who disagrees. A pretending any of the aforementioned religions are on the stage of forced conversion is laughable if you're older than 15, otherwise it's just false
371.
by muyuu 4y ago
nominally they do, both things they carry post-Galilean duality of the spiritual and the natural, and they literally aim to be the world's single religion there is no contradiction between aiming to be unifying, and believing this grea
372.
by muyuu 4y ago
yes, then you go for the subsystem route as in MacOS Classic or Win32 perhaps worth a shot but I seriously doubt the compatibility is going to be worth enough for enough people, instead of just running an emulator
373.
by muyuu 4y ago
not only it's theoretically possible, it happens and it can already be observed on clean lab experiments with normally used parameters the probability that LLMs produce copyrighted information is no proof that it was trained with it ex
374.
by muyuu 4y ago
the short answer is "no" this is a question that came up often when he was asked on his motivation to dedicate so much time on debunking religion and religious practice it wasn't a question about God or some God, it was a que
375.
by muyuu 4y ago
why would you bother with the overhead to make it Palm-compatible though? at most, an emulation subsystem might make sense, but having all things including new development run in a Palm-compatible system right now makes no sense. Note that
376.
by muyuu 4y ago
I believe he was always aware of this, but thought it was different this time because of wide access to information and technology, etc. Reading that, it does sound like a sort of religious belief, but that's how he (Dawkins) had posed
377.
by muyuu 4y ago
yes, I meant Dawkins sorry for not mentioning him by name in the post above
378.
by muyuu 4y ago
Some are, some aren't. See Koala for instance. The problem with Koala is that it fine-tunes on open sourced data, but makes no claims about the data for the base LLaMA models. https://bair.berkeley.edu/blog/2023&#x
379.
by muyuu 4y ago
In a recent interview he [edit to clarify: "he" here means Richard Dawkins] completely dismissed the fact that a lot of new atheists had religious fervour for their humanistic non-theist beliefs and that he had been on the wrong e
380.
by muyuu 4y ago
FreeDOS is exactly what I was describing. Makes sense to use that old software, but not to actually develop for these days. Because you'd be imposing weird anachronistic restrictions on yourself for no good reason.
381.
by muyuu 4y ago
Well, that does make sense. It wasn't a slight at you. I appreciate good work and also recreational computing. But is reviving Palm a practical endeavour? Nope, sorry. The emulator is a good idea for whatever abandonware people might w
382.
by muyuu 4y ago
With machine learning you have the same kind of problems with an added factor of unpredictability. ML to make the recommendations more dynamic per user means people are not seeing the same things and engagement tanks. ML to make the recomme
383.
by muyuu 4y ago
As much as I love retro stuff I see no point in reviving Palm. It's like bringing back MS-DOS, perhaps you have something ready made for that environment and you want to use it as is because you don't want to relearn some newer in
384.
by muyuu 4y ago
Canadianfella's reply is dead so I'll reply here. Eventually Symbian (sp?) was better and when Sony killed their Zire division I just have Palm Treo one last chance. It was a bit laggy and the battery didn't last long enough.
385.
by muyuu 4y ago
You cannot heavily quantise models and assume they didn't degrade significantly. To run it properly you need a lot more than a Mac Studio, and then comparisons need to be done more or less seriously, not just a few random prompts, beca
386.
by muyuu 4y ago
13B on my computer does produce useful output, it's pretty hit and miss though GPT-3.5 OTOH is much better, but it's also much better at producing convincing-sounding but completely incorrect answers
387.
by muyuu 4y ago
his conclusion is simultaneously not warranted and correct a like-for-like comparison would be GPT-4 against the larger models like LLaMA 65B, but those cannot be run on consumer-grade hardware so one ends up comparing the stuff one can run
388.
by muyuu 4y ago
I think it's safe to say that it really didn't become a popular hobby, from that 90s perspective.
389.
by muyuu 4y ago
I think the most obvious explanation, one that doesn't even require much imagination because it just coincides with the very concept of history and pre-history, is that people lost a lot of stuff when only oral tradition was kept and t
390.
by muyuu 4y ago
maybe something like dumb.box ? I think the .box suffix might be very appropriate, something like brainless.box or whatever, I know it's unconventional though, perhaps .tv is better

More ›