3 ms·
why would you bother with the overhead to make it Palm-compatible though? at most, an emulation subsystem might make sense, but having all things including new
by muyuu 4y ago
why would you bother with the overhead to make it Palm-compatible though? at most, an emulation subsystem might make sense, but having all things including new development run in a Palm-compatible system right now makes no sense.
Note that it wouldn't even be a dumbphone by definition if it has an OS running arbitrarily installed software on it.
- dmitrygr 4y ago> why would you bother with the overhead to make it Palm-compatible though Not having to design and explain API is a plus
- muyuu 4y agoyes, then you go for the subsystem route as in MacOS Classic or Win32 perhaps worth a shot but I seriously doubt the compatibility is going to be worth enough for enough people, instead of just running an emulator