4 ms·
not only it's theoretically possible, it happens and it can already be observed on clean lab experiments with normally used parameters the probability that LLM
by muyuu 4y ago
not only it's theoretically possible, it happens and it can already be observed on clean lab experiments
with normally used parameters the probability that LLMs produce copyrighted information is no proof that it was trained with it exactly, esp. when parameters are set so they don't repeat outputs
- Arelius 4y agoI think you'll find that it is in fact proof by all practical standards we use outside of formal mathematics.
- muyuu 4y agothe moment you cannot in any practical way tell if the data set was corrupted with copyrighted material, nobody will convict you for any accidental violations that may occur, even in the astronomically low probability that they do with standard parameters
- Arelius 4y agoMy point is being able to reliably reproduce copyright works will function as a very practical way to tell if the dataset was corrupted with copyrighted material. In that way it’ll be a lot easier to prove that a dataset was corrupted, then proving the negative.