mrangle

22 ms·

181.
by mrangle 2y ago
Ironically this statement glosses over the indisputable issue of the specifics of the paperwork volume, and the change in it over time. "Regulations exist everywhere" is far to general an argument to be meaningful in my opinion. H
182.
by mrangle 2y ago
I don't know a lot, but I do know that the legal profession will change itself as required to protect itself. Which includes protecting itself from being completely intolerable to the wider populace. This is a law of the Universe on pa
183.
by mrangle 2y ago
I can't imagine taking The Atlantic seriously on anything. My word. You aren't actually supposed to read the endless ragebait. Contrary to the Atlantic's almost always intentionally misleading framing, the "dot com boom&
184.
by mrangle 2y ago
There's going to be a significant exodus of Amazon employees once the mandate kicks in fully. A percentage aren't able to come into the office every day, due to unrealistic commute logistics. Google making this headline sets them
185.
by mrangle 2y ago
That's false on all counts. You're engaging in incorrect conjecture in regard to what he stated. Further, what Christ "would not endorse" is your conjecture and not fact. Christianity is not about allowing society be de
186.
by mrangle 2y ago
I don't know why this would be surprising. There's nothing more obvious than the fact that research is riddled with both fraud and laughably shoddy work.
187.
by mrangle 2y ago
Enthusiast bliss is a revved out manual in a flyweight car on a curvy road. Likely in low gear and at lower speed: in the range that you cited. While I admit its severely wanting and the car will suffer for the abuse on the turns, I can get
188.
by mrangle 2y ago
Lost in translation, the Commandment is not to murder. Legal killing of the guilty (of murder), and in self defense for example, is not murder. Just as it isn't in the secular legal system. Therefore, there is no conflict. That's
189.
by mrangle 2y ago
My understanding isn't out of date whatsoever. Your understanding is wishcasting. You citing the appearance of the Model S Plaid at "youtube drag races" reflects more of your lack of understanding than my own. The double clut
190.
by mrangle 2y ago
What's your point? Future or now, my point about vanity remains. I don't see any point in arguing over my use of the word "future" here. Again, "faster" isn't the most important metric for car enthusiasts.
191.
by mrangle 2y ago
ICE aren't niche, and there isn't strong evidence that they will be. There doesn't seem to be a public Come-to-Jesus moment for electric cars on the horizon. There seems to be solid reasoning behind that reluctance. That is,
192.
by mrangle 2y ago
Which was most helpful? Or if you can't pick one then what were the best two?
193.
by mrangle 2y ago
I took the quiz, but am going to decline to give a score or other info. Maybe consider me to be qualified to comment, however. I understand "unsafe', albeit this is a little vague. But I get it. Given that, I surmise that your cor
194.
by mrangle 2y ago
There is obviously a massive gap on one side at the least, especially given the complexity of GT. You seem to be strangely bothered by the subtlest implication that Gobekli Tepe lacks an obvious forbearer. Which I would truly love to see by
195.
by mrangle 2y ago
The Bay Area 2073: one salary-maxed unionized unskilled State worker monitoring the Ai power led.
196.
by mrangle 2y ago
Nonsense. Ultimately, it's a zero sum game and therefore there can not be shared interest between business owners and Unions. You may have detente or even just a laid back employee base. But you're only pro-Union insofar as you ar
197.
by mrangle 2y ago
It is a wrong assumption. The only activity of a business is to turn a profit.
198.
by mrangle 2y ago
But unskilled union labor dictates that it has to be them or those whom they approve of "around to do the actual work" ("actual" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here) or else the business that they don't own can&#x2
199.
by mrangle 2y ago
>When Chomsky was in his teens he read Orwell’s “Animal Farm,” “which,” he told me in 1995, “struck me as amusing but pretty obvious” What a massive tool. Animal Farm was so obvious to Noam Chomsky that he forwent writing it, and he&#x27
200.
by mrangle 2y ago
Because average citizens and politicians don't generally attract (unceasing) partisan lawfare that is tantamount to systemic corruption. When prosecutors campaign on pursuing an individual, when such efforts are multipolar and unending
201.
by mrangle 2y ago
Rioting wasn't the core context of the comment nor my response. Here's the relevant comment: "It is people who feel inferior looking to attach themselves to something they perceive as great. It is very difficult for many peo
202.
by mrangle 2y ago
An irrelevant complaint until the cited stats are, first, confirmed with a research critique and then compared to parallel stats in the context of ultimate successful criminal prosecutions without (compared to with) shot spotter. Because th
203.
by mrangle 2y ago
Nah. You're over-reacting to an extremely common, normal, and acceptable social tool because you have an agenda. What that is could be a couple of things, from a petty dislike of anyone who has anything to be proud about to an imbalanc
204.
by mrangle 2y ago
Are those people not part of the culture that they reference? They're literally telling you how they do things, as a member of said culture. Are people not allowed now to reference successful methods that they practice, and their origi
205.
by mrangle 2y ago
It seems to have a lot of bearing.
206.
by mrangle 2y ago
I predict that the "belittle them until morale improves" tactic won't ever work. In fact, belittling them seems like the small man tactic in comparison with a simple affinity for tribal history (real or otherwise).
207.
by mrangle 2y ago
Claiming national history is about the most common thing in the world for a nation to do. It's far from weird, rioting and unusual dismissal tactics aside.
208.
by mrangle 2y ago
Was this response supposed to be relevant to the age question under discussion? Because that was the context of my response. Second, my response both implies that the game and the government are indistinguishable and that what it is suppose
209.
by mrangle 2y ago
>I don't see political language at all. The article links to openly political articles. Whatever the supposed context (excuse), this is a political act in the context of a research presentation. As if this is not enough, the article
210.
by mrangle 2y ago
The guiding principle of science is to never assume that the results are correct. Two observations: this is a highly political topic and there is highly political language in the linked article. Its conclusions also rely on the integrity of

More ›