mrangle

20 ms·

211.
by mrangle 2y ago
For Pete's sake. I'm a clinician who works in child development pathology, which is why I commented. You have zero idea of what you are talking about. Your unprofessional hyperbole and willful misconstrual of clear statements asid
212.
by mrangle 2y ago
You would. Congressional politics is closer to a complex game than a cognitive exercise. A game that is only learned and won with experience.
213.
by mrangle 2y ago
Sets out to write an article on the dangers of Neurotargeting. Immediately employs Neurotargeting in the article.
214.
by mrangle 2y ago
There is a difference or Recall would be redundant, and you and they wouldn't care about it so much. It wouldn't exist. Your insistent advocacy and what you are demanding people accept, in Recall's supposed relative insignifi
215.
by mrangle 2y ago
No. Allowing a child to direct their own development is a weird and damaging strategic fallacy that is making the rounds. Child development is absolutely dependent on how much language the child hears and reads, and is measured by child lan
216.
by mrangle 2y ago
>Recall is neither the first nor the last thing to record and store your actions and data. Why is it such a big problem? Not agreeing to something that one does not want, in spite of tolerating qualitatively similar yet different objects
217.
by mrangle 2y ago
Houses largely don't get built without being presold. Presales are not going to happen without a significant interest rate drop. Interest rates aren't going to drop. This isn't the multifamily market under discussion. Rent pr
218.
by mrangle 2y ago
I see no evidence of a supply shortage in my large representative market. If you want an older house or a new one, its available. They seem to be implying that building 2 million new houses is the means to reduce housing prices. That isn&#x
219.
by mrangle 2y ago
Explain "hypocrisy". As far as "overblown" goes, there's no other realm of social balance wherein concession to something means an obligation to an extreme. Last, your statement falsely presupposes that most are hap
220.
by mrangle 2y ago
Cynicism is forgivable. Smart, even. Given that it implies expectations from experience. Naivete, and possibly "willful naivete", on the other hand is not forgivable given perceived stakes by many. It's not cynical whatsoever
221.
by mrangle 2y ago
That there is some kind of large community consensus on anything will always be a fallacy. There's an Ivory Tower, the Media, and then a lot of suffering individuals underneath both. People with issues like to exercise them on a vulner
222.
by mrangle 2y ago
There's a lot of over self-diagnosis because autism is the trendiest disorder aside from ADHD. That being said, the majority of accurate adult diagnosis will at least begin and often end with self diagnosis. It will end with it sometim
223.
by mrangle 2y ago
Not only those essential bodies of knowledge, but anyone who has tried to develop not even a novel product but simply a well executed brand knows the level of almost superhuman focus it takes. Implying that much of what is on the shelf is b
224.
by mrangle 2y ago
Well put. This is the premise that I think best describes Type 1 autism's central function.
225.
by mrangle 2y ago
Autism is definitely not inherited? Autism being "too broad" is why it doesn't have a genetic cause? Autism's nomenclature not being descriptive enough is why it doesn't have a genetic cause? Autism not being as deb
226.
by mrangle 2y ago
Inter-species brain size similarity isn't a large behavioral correlation. It's fun to ponder, though.
227.
by mrangle 2y ago
This post has skill issues. The cab driver study has no bearing on a sex difference study. The subject groups are intentionally too different. One cannot port a conclusion from it to the other study. Only as a theme in a hypothesis. Ergo, y
228.
by mrangle 2y ago
The typical method is short term alcohol abuse. Joking/not joking. The effect is mixed. Pruning may occur. Autism incurable. There are ideologues who like to police others in every divergent group that falls in a normative IQ range. Tr
229.
by mrangle 2y ago
"I'd normalize if I could" and "People with Type 1 Autism should have more social room" can be held at the same time. This isn't always the case, but much of the time the trauma is due to an ill fit rather than
230.
by mrangle 2y ago
There's nothing twisted nor interpretive about it. The FBI was fully integrated into Twitter Trust and Safety.
231.
by mrangle 2y ago
Nope. The FBI was long integrated into twitter Trust and Safety. At that point, Twitter's speech decisions ceased being a private matter according to Supreme Court case Law. Please. Give us all a break. There's nothing conspirator
232.
by mrangle 2y ago
You're ignorant of the facts of the situation.
233.
by mrangle 2y ago
Trump was not "the head of the government agencies", in terms of functional control. Implying conspiratorial thinking is not an argument against the concrete facts. Which are that a). The FBI was integrated into Trust and Safety a
234.
by mrangle 2y ago
I think that you are unnecessarily getting lost in semantics. Regardless, I'll clear up my meaning. By "parliament" I'm indeed referring to a legislature or a body of lawmakers that passes law. Often, that body is named
235.
by mrangle 2y ago
One might think. But common and even corporate landlords are not that powerful. See the fact that the FBI is raiding them for price fixing. Which they should, as rent prices are a major political instability pressure point and a major facto
236.
by mrangle 2y ago
What I mean is the undeniable integration of government agencies with Twitter Trust and Safety, at the time. Right here, this ends our discussion. But also the partisan support for the ban, on partisan grounds, from Congress and the governm
237.
by mrangle 2y ago
Why? I'm referring to what comprises "good", meaning democratic, policy for political content. Not an autistic implementation of rules or lack thereof. But if you want to plaster a Vote Biden poster on some poor working perso
238.
by mrangle 2y ago
When a sitting President is banned for political speech and at the behest of partisan narrative, that's anti-democratic authoritarianism. Sorry, "anti-authoritarianism" doesn't mean that unelected people with the power t
239.
by mrangle 2y ago
Also, "the rest of (you)" are not even beholden to the "same set of rules". Twitter was happy to serve as a platform for actual high level riot incitement and support for nine months prior to the election. That's ac
240.
by mrangle 2y ago
No one should be banned for content that isn't illegal. Anything less promotes partisan abuse of censorship mechanisms, which harms democracy. First amendment law provides an adequate guideline, as enforced everywhere else and as defin

More ›