mr_mitm

37 ms·

781.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Your comment reminds me of this fantastic song: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rhl5K0mTSKY He is not wrong.
782.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
It aims at replacing them all, including venv, pipx, and more. > Think: a single binary that bootstraps your Python installation and gives you everything you need to be productive with Python, bundling not only pip, pip-tools, and virtua
783.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
They're not popping up, the wave function simply branches. In Copenhagen you cut off the branches, in MWI you do not. Total energy in MWI is the weighted sum of the energy of all branches (weighted according to borns rule). If one coul
784.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
No, my question was: why did Copenhagen become generally accepted? You're saying: it just is, deal with it. That's unsatisfactory. Copenhagen proponents never seem to have to defend their stance, and you're telling me they do
785.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Why is no one ever asking how to falsify Copenhagen vs other interpretations? What did Copenhagen ever do to deserve this privilege?
786.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Of course it would falsify quantum mechanics, because MWI is nothing but the most austere version of QM. But people always speak of Copenhagen as if it was the standard interpretation of QM and everything else must be measurable different f
787.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Technically, if you find a system that doesn't satisfy the Schrödinger equation, you have falsified many worlds. On the other hand, is the wave function collapse falsifiable? Note that MWI makes less assumptions than Copenhagen.
788.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
I know. He must be oversimplifying. It's pretty basic stuff, the way it's phrased it's definitely wrong.
789.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
It's wrong
790.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
We've known for over one hundred years that all forms of energy influence the curvature of spacetime: mass, radiation, momentum, pressure. The source of the gravitational field is literally called the energy-stress-tensor. This, howeve
791.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Relative to what it was before. It has an intrinsic size. Think of it in terms of matter density if you find it more comfortable. The density simply goes down over time; distandes between galaxies increase.
792.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
This would also be the case on a hypersphere, which would also satisfy the cosmological principle. A torus is not isotropic.
793.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
I didn't count it, but I think papers from high energy particle physics have it beat. Some have over 5k authors.
794.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
There are many other protocols besides SMB that can be used to share a file. Webdav, ftp, nfs, two systems accessing a third file share, shared folders in a VM, ... Or a file share provided by RDP like in the example, which does not include
795.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Very cool. Thanks for letting me know!
796.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
I did that trickery and it works: https://github.com/AdrianVollmer/Zundler (I had to fix the mime type detection and I'll have to push that fix to PyPI, so use the main branch if you want to try it yourself.) Unfo
797.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
So it's like Debian Unstable?
798.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Wait, can you explain Fedora>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Debian? Should I be looking at switching?
799.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
It's not finding Metasploit, Impacket or BloodHound (but instead Metasploit Cheat Sheets or PlumHound), which are absolute heavy weights in the offensive security sector. How did you gather that data?
800.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
It's linear for small redshifts only. In general it depends on what distance you mean, but it's never linear. This does not change the validity of your argument of course. Check https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki&#x2F
801.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Fury Road was certainly not a cash grab, but a prequel to the blockbuster of the 10s except with a female lead definitely smells like a cash grab.
802.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
I don't like playing that card, but I am a physicist, a cosmologist actually, and I wrote in my last post how it breaks. And I used the qualifier "approximation" in my first post of this thread. If you don't assume homog
803.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Your memory deceives you. The CMB was found accidentally in the sense that its discoverers were simply trying to reduce noise and found this one stubborn source, but it was predicted by Alpher twenty years prior. Can you go into how you wou
804.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Little value? It's one of the assumptions that lead us to the prediction of the CMB which we then found. It's proved very fruitful, I'd say. Without the cosmological principle, modern cosmology is a complete non-starter. I&#x
805.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
Yes, that is why the scientists did a statistical analysis, otherwise it wouldn't be worthy of publication. From the arXiv paper: > Using the Convex Hull of Member Spheres (CHMS) algorithm, we estimate that the annulus and inner abs
806.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
> Have you ever seen an original physical copy of, say, Einstein's annus mirabilis papers I was a grad student at the institute for theoretical physics in Heidelberg. It's famously housed in two old villas with little room for
807.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
1. It's the energy content. The stuff you can see (baryonic matter) is 5%, dark matter is 25%, the rest is dark energy. Technically you should take radiation into account, but this is negligible in today's universe. The types of e
808.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
> Maybe we're part of an infinitely large cosmos where our false vacuum has these parameters, and others don't (statistical multiverse / baby universe models). You'd be in good company with that approach. Ironically,
809.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
> I kinda agree about researching the end of the Universe, It's a fallacy to believe that people are specifically researching the end of the Universe. We research models. The standard model for example is parameterized by six number
810.
by mr_mitm 2y ago
There is nothing to agree on. You make measurements, see what model fits best, and then ask the model what will happen as time goes to infinity. And we did have a consensus: the standard model of cosmology. It fits the data best, that'

More ›