> Maybe we're part of an infinitely large cosmos where our false vacuum has these parameters, and others don't (statistical multiverse / baby universe models).

> Maybe we're part of an infinitely large cosmos where our false vacuum has these parameters, and others don't (statistical multiverse / baby universe models). You'd be in good company with that approach. Ironically, it becomes easier to explain if dark energy wasn't constant (see: TFA), because then you can make an anthropic argument, that only this part of the universe leads to complex structure and thus life. But for that you have study alternative models which might just be right. >We just don't know, and sometimes it's enough to know that we don't know. That is a very anti-science take that I find problematic. Curiosity is a very human trait and has been proven to be fruitful.