Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mpolichette
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mpolichette
11d ago
Ahh, the bay selection was what I was missing! That works wonderfully. Thank you! P.S. I showed this to a friend, and he asked if we could mock something up, export the dxf, and send it to a cut shop... you could end up with your own flatpa
2.
▲
by
mpolichette
11d ago
Yeah... I was trying to figure out what he was pointing to, and was like.. oh, the Firefox website... went there and was pretty uninspired by the design, at least in desktop.
3.
▲
by
mpolichette
12d ago
One other note, is there a way to see the bay map larger? I am trying to see the height between shelves and the measurement does not show because there is not enough space for it. I know I could do the math :P
4.
▲
by
mpolichette
12d ago
This is amazing, I may use it for a built-in pantry i'm planning to build. In my use case, I end up with one side at an angle, is there a way to support that?
5.
▲
by
mpolichette
8mo ago
I don't disagree, but I think there is the otherside of that same coin... What if we could do other stuff while remaining productive. Rather than the example of missing first steps, what if we had, "Ok Claude, prepare a few slide
6.
▲
by
mpolichette
8mo ago
I thought they were talking about one of their coworkers /s
7.
▲
by
mpolichette
11mo ago
I've recently started writing an app intended for a raspberry pi that uses IMAP to automate this exact thing. The goal is for it to apply the rules and followup with actions while still letting me interact with my email from any client
8.
▲
by
mpolichette
1y ago
I'd also consider that, for these people, getting away with the cheating _is the game_ for them. What they're cheating at might be less important.
9.
▲
by
mpolichette
2y ago
Short of jail, nowhere in adulthood are you required to stay somewhere by law. On top of that, I don’t think the kid quietly using their phone and ignoring class is the main issue here… it’s causing issues with the other kids and making the
10.
▲
by
mpolichette
3y ago
I like the cataloging, but I dont see the periodic part of this.
11.
▲
by
mpolichette
3y ago
Could dementia in congress create a security threat?
12.
▲
by
mpolichette
3y ago
I tend to agree, however, I typically tell people that if you see longer function names, you should watch out for complexity. In fact, if I have to write some overly complex code that I can’t isolate for some reason, I will usually try to
13.
▲
by
mpolichette
3y ago
Computers were invented to speed up calculations, and yet the primary thing we use them for today is to read the news and send each other messages and memes… I think it’s totally reasonable, to expect developers to find the real use
14.
▲
by
mpolichette
4y ago
I have the same rules
15.
▲
by
mpolichette
4y ago
I think this option is still ripe for issues within a domestic abuse situation. The abuser would simply use their phone to “trust it”. Maybe a longer dismissal though?
16.
▲
by
mpolichette
4y ago
I always have to remind myself that they’re dependency arrows and not a sequence ordering. They make it look like it flows right to left even though time (or at least sequence) flows left to right.
17.
▲
by
mpolichette
4y ago
Oh, come on now, Zabzonk is a great name
18.
▲
by
mpolichette
4y ago
I read this as “The book is included”
19.
▲
by
mpolichette
4y ago
If you don’t fix it… and the code is working… what is the problem? I leave notes like that sometime as indicators of intention… or invitation to the next reader… but if it never changes and is not causing issues… that’s fine, leave it as is
20.
▲
by
mpolichette
4y ago
I can empathize with the author here that types can be very challenging to get right, especially with high amounts of dynamism. However, I think that saying it is "terrible for library developers" is a bit far. I think its terrib
21.
▲
by
mpolichette
4y ago
I've been using Workflowy for years now. I really love it. They been working lots of interesting features in but stick to the basics that everything starts as a list. You would be surprised what is possible w/ just a list!
22.
▲
by
mpolichette
5y ago
MDN docs are the best... they should monetize via high level articles and example implementations for systems. For example, the webRTC docs are great and explain a lot about how it works... however, there is very little information about go
23.
▲
by
mpolichette
5y ago
I think these questions come from the idea baked into charitable giving. When you purchase a good, the thing you're getting is obvious, it is what you're purchasing. However, when you're giving to charity, what are you getti
24.
▲
by
mpolichette
5y ago
I've thought about hooking into messages w/ a running mac before... Do you have a high level description of your approach? I looked in the iMessage GraphQL Server server repo for docs but didn't see anything obvious... On a
25.
▲
by
mpolichette
5y ago
I'll entertain this... Because, like it or not, you're often still sending/receiving documents? :) Also the semantics of the actions map really well to the use cases still. You're, of course, more than welcome to avoid t
26.
▲
by
mpolichette
5y ago
I'm with you on this one. I prefer it to be in your face simple to understand over the terse-ness. In the gist example, I actually prefer the SQL-92 approach where we are joining given an explicit comparison condition. Every other imp
27.
▲
by
mpolichette
5y ago
This ^ I feel like JS gets thrown under the bus in discussions, but no body talks about arcane file structures in Java or implicit pathing lookups which have the same kind of "historical path dependence" to why they exist as JS ha
28.
▲
by
mpolichette
5y ago
I want to agree with you... the problem arises because you're applying your values to those items... e.g. "yeah they're embarrassing/bad, but not really that bad"... However, it becomes scary when the people with ac
29.
▲
by
mpolichette
5y ago
I hope it stays down... oh wait, that was yesterdays thing...
30.
▲
by
mpolichette
5y ago
I used a fake name/email... went through the 22 questions and got meaningless results. Questions get grouped into 3 groups and you get a numerical score... literally it only says "Result: 22". No scale, no units, at best th
More ›