Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
monadINtop
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
If I dont go to work I starve. If I organise with my colleagues for a more favourable contract I will be removed by security guards. If we protest this we will be arrested by police. Are you able to only recognise force the moment blood is
62.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
I consider you wrong since an alliance presupposes a unity of interest whereas the interest of a worker (get more money, work less or maybe more nuanced: have as much control over own work as possible, have as much exposure to fruits of wor
63.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
then you are interested in a version of physics that doesn't exist, even though some might choose to supress the details at low level
64.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
You need measure theory for probability, economics, QFT and Physics, etc. And who is doing "all the math"? The vast majority of resarchers who "do math" are largely in PDEs and other fields that simply use the technology
65.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
it was revealed in a vision
66.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
yeah, and they pushed it as a theory of everything (which I think they had justification to believe for the first few decades [~] to get funding. So I also blame the entire economic system that academia is unfortunately embedded in. [~] It
67.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
No one should hate string theory??? No one should hate any area of valid research? That sounds extremely dogmatic and reactionary. String theory specifically is an extremely rich and fruitful theory that has had huge application to mathemat
68.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
So it's an absolute moonshot that posits that all observed discrepencies of galactic rotation curves is actually due to a coincidental and highly unlikely distribution of topological defects (that are not consistent with the full field
69.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
Here's to surviving in the face of a near century long ethnic cleansing and apartheid. Its gonna be very strange one day to look back on this period of history and see everyone claiming that they were always against it, just as they do
70.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
What a waste of time. Who provides funding for this? Also mildly annoying to use "isomorphism" outside of mathematics to describe a relation or analogy between things. You can just say relation or analogy. Relying on the technical
71.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25006809 https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/09/10/noam-chomsky-and-the... stop spreading lies that have been debunked for decades, not everyone share your ina
72.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
There is zero understanding of the cause of internal experience. We can't even strictly define what it is. My contention isn't that materialism doesn't appear to be a reasonable canditate for cognitive process, but that we st
73.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
Is creating things of aesthetic quality not of value with respect to the human condition? Is not some subset of that aesthetic quality derivative of the intuition and intention of a human mind? Sure, if you want to build some tehchnology to
74.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
No, you need intelligent things to be intelligent. And it would probably be good to distinguish between "things that appear superficially intelligent" and "things that have genuine capacity for internal experience" while
75.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
The distinction is philosophical. Tech bros consider "art assests" or consumer oriented products as art. In their eyes its capibility as a tool for profit is a downstream effect. My point was that since their entire purpose in lif
76.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
Yep, you're right. But idk why you phrased that like it's a rebuttal to my criticism. This is another failure of our economic system, for incentivising the owners of art production to churn out literal mindless slop to cut costs,
77.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
lol sometimes I wonder if the reason so many tech bros make so many grandiose statements about how AI has already trancended the bounds of human creativity is because they've never really had actual experience with art and literature a
78.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
People don't uncover new mathematics with formal rules and symbols pushing, at least not for the most part. They do so first with intuition and vague belief. Formalisation and rigour is the final stage of constructing a proof or argume
79.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
No. Not in my experience. Anyone with experience in research mathematics will tell you that making progress at the research level is driven by intuition - intuition honed from years of training with formal rules and rigor but intuition none
80.
▲
by
monadINtop
2y ago
the technical math definition is a rigourous formulation that encapsulates exactly the same thing as what we mean when we say things are curved, but one that also extends far more generally into contexts where our old intuition fails. The s
81.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
it's not more likely, it just does. If we couldn't re-derive all known laws of classical mechanics and thermodynamics from the large scale limit of quantum mechanics, than we would have rejected quantum mechanics as wrong (or inco
82.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
that comparison should make you appreciate the unfathomable distances between even the most local astronomical objects, not underestimate it. The distance between continents is hard enough for the human brain to comprehend, and imagine the
83.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
Yes but this paper isn't isn't an island unto itself. It's a nice little lemma that can illustrate a point within the subject of special relativity, from a different perspective. It could be included as a small derivation in
84.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
Nature - Quick to publish, slow to retract
85.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
he was the first shitposter
86.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
>failed How? There was no economic failure. It ended due to a political coup. After all there was the slight external complication of a proxy war considered by many to be a prelude to the defining conflict of the 20th century. >never
87.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
>tended to use meme/gifs in place of what I'd consider "real" communication You don't consider humour a form of real communication? Are you sure you should be looking down on them
88.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
Yeah that's fair, although having an ad-free version of YouTube that was completely synced with your account had lots of advantages compared totthe seperate mirror world you get with newpipe. Overall I'm glad both of them exist(ed
89.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
I understand the point you're making, but the statement that > they would have been unlikely to work on nuclear weapons development, and millions more would have likely perished in a land invasion of Japan despite being constantly r
90.
▲
by
monadINtop
3y ago
It will never be as good as Youtube Vanced (god rest it's soul) but it gets the job done, despite the occasional bug
More ›