monadINtop

14 ms·

91.
by monadINtop 3y ago
What are you talking about? Private property refers to the ownership of the organs of economic production - factories, steal mills, whatever - by private institutions (e.g shareholder-managed organisations). If your referring to markets in
92.
by monadINtop 3y ago
>If we do have division of labor and pay each other for the work, we've reinvented capitalism. This is extremely wrong. Every society in human history has some degree of division of labour. Capitalism is a specific economic mode of
93.
by monadINtop 3y ago
Right, and I'd further argue that one of the most significant deciding factor in such cases is the relation of those former colonies to the hegemonic power (either in the region or globally). For example places like Singapore and South
94.
by monadINtop 3y ago
In essentially every case outside of a rounding error, most people within a given company (or society) derive their income from selling their labour on the job market. This makes them workers, and thus they share a common material interest
95.
by monadINtop 3y ago
The only universal truths I know are in category theory, and maybe physics depending on your disposition. But that word has nothing to do with economics or the social sciences. P.S. Is private capital included in your definition of "in
96.
by monadINtop 3y ago
What's your opinion? For me this is pleasant news. It's a nice change to see workers and labour retain some ability to project their power, which in turn is in the interest of the vast majority of people. Since the inception of mo
97.
by monadINtop 3y ago
No worries man
98.
by monadINtop 3y ago
> I believe one of the worst outcomes of colonization is that these countries lost their monarchies and lacked a natural progression to diplomacy I think this is a very loaded and fraught perspective that ignores a large amount of contex
99.
by monadINtop 3y ago
Yes people who follow the rules and do well in "school maths" are very likely to also do well and succeed in "higher mathematics". Unfortunately, this selection misses (most?) children who may not be well suited to &quot