mjyoon

4 ms·

1.
by mjyoon 9mo ago
I remember this from last year! Awesome project - I'd love to see the code behind this.
2.
by mjyoon 2y ago
Unfortunate that Mistral OCR can't tell me details presented in charts and graphs.
3.
by mjyoon 2y ago
The original poster said "spend a ton of money" (those places you spend money but not a "ton") and I've included churches as an example. This short list isn't comprehensive. Also, have you been to a library rec
4.
by mjyoon 2y ago
I don't buy this - there are third spaces where you don't need to spend money and they've been here forever and are usually accessible. Churches, libraries, parks, certain community recreational facilities, gyms ,etc. It&#x27
5.
by mjyoon 2y ago
Yeah, I'd love an app on Windows that can index text files, images, and pdfs recursively through a directory.
6.
by mjyoon 2y ago
Soy is a complete protein. IF you need all the essential amino acids, you eat a variety of sources. https://www.chhs.colostate.edu/krnc/monthly-blog/plant-based...
7.
by mjyoon 3y ago
I said beans and other plant proteins which includes soy, hemp, legumes, oats, nuts, amaranth, etc. which are already grown in the US regions where land is used to graze cattle. Not sure why you're singling out beans.
8.
by mjyoon 3y ago
There is a better term than murder sure, but you're still "killing" a plant or animal therefore ending it's life. People who use the term raise the plant or animal's importance of life to that of a human. Whether yo
9.
by mjyoon 3y ago
Phytoestrogens have little or no effect in the human body. Animal hormones and antibiotics however do have adverse affects. Vegans tend to have a bigger issue with the larger organizations of the animal agriculture industry, not the whole -
10.
by mjyoon 3y ago
You can use the land to grow beans and other plant protein as opposed to grain. There is another level of opportunity costs. Without the need to use land to produce animal products, we can use less land and grow a larger variety of crops.
11.
by mjyoon 3y ago
It's not a 'lie', it's a discrepancy between whether an animal (non-human) life equates a human life. I know you don't think so, but to call it a 'lie' is false.