Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
matz1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
82 ms
·
901.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>How does anyone think it's acceptable to [funcitonally] detain people From the business perspective, provided they can get a way with it, it is just another business decision, namely reducing cost and increasing profit. I would do
902.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Of course, all drugs, including heroin should be allowed to be sold at 7-11s.
903.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Hard work is pain and pain does hurt.
904.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Sure, it is not a hassle for you but it can be a huge hassle for other people.
905.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>but these sort of physiques are definitely not the kind that are perceived as desirable The trick is you do not tell them its a result of steroids.
906.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
It is a common misconception that the only way to be jacked is by hard work.
907.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Then its not a lie because there is no intention for someone to misinterpret it.
908.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
If you put your restriction on yourself then you are responsible on fixing the situation yourself. Its not acceptable to simply say 'I would not work at all'.
909.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
It is not a lie. Sure someone could misinterpret it but it is not a lie.
910.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Did the company mandate you to use separate laptop or you put your restriction yourself ?
911.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
But wouldn't that other car be classified as error?
912.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Likewise, making any kind of tweet including inflammatory/offensive kind shouldn't cause grief in the future.
913.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
He very well maybe, the point is whatever you do there will be trade off.
914.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Having no online presence can also be viewed suspicious. Pick your poison.
915.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
If you are insurance company you should want it. If you are customer you shouldn't want it. Every party can have different interest and should fight for their own interest.
916.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
The rules itself is egrigeous, that's why there is an incentive for lying in the first place. If the goal is for science, there shouldn't be restriction on working with other country in order to accept grant.
917.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Is there a way to be strong without exercising ? You are right, there may be a way, I am hoping there maybe something to consider...
918.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>what about the immediate emotional effects of the responses? Our brain/body is good at adapting so you simply ignore it or rather embrace the pain, yes it will be painful in the beginning but the more you are exposed to it the bett
919.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
To not give a fuck, like anything else is something that you can train yourself to get used to.
920.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>I wonder what a good approach would be for jobs which need to be done, but are harmful to the people doing them? So like any other job, only people who are suitable for the job should apply for the job. Not every one is harmed by gore v
921.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
That's why these FANG company pay outrageous salary.
922.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
It's not dishonest, whether something is good or bad is never absolute. Something that is bad for someone is not necessarily bad for others.
923.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>Neither my friend nor my other classmates see the problem with the precise tracking of the every move of every employee - that scares me a lot. Thats the thing with ethics, its completely subjective.
924.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Sure, of you have be careful to not be taken advantage off, focus on the prize, if you truly do not see any opportunity then yes bail out but keep your options open.
925.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Please explain, i think the idea make sense. The menial job id done to show that no job is beneath you and to open up greater opportunity.
926.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
>Why should others have to work so some can stay at home all day? they don't have to, they can stay at home too but stay at home can be very depressing.
927.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Or maybe make it easier, less annoying to use.
928.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Trying to shift security to end user wouldn't improve security. Most people value convenience over security. Then the bank is not doing a good job. Its the bank responsibility to secure my account. How they do it is up to them . I don&
929.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
Sure but if it become annoying then most people, including me will choose convinience over security every time. That's where I critize security professional. They often disregard this end user pain. You have to find frictionless soluti
930.
▲
by
matz1
7y ago
So the doctor has to ensure security in addition of treating patient? Why do we need security professional then ?
More ›