matz1

98 ms·

931.
by matz1 7y ago
>We trade convenience for security every single day Which is totally sucks. >Ever get locked out of your house because you forgot your keys? Why is that level of inconvenience (requiring keys on doors) okay I would not say that is oka
932.
by matz1 7y ago
"people dying" might be exaggerated but nonetheless because of the password he is inconvenienced. So you have to come up with different method. For the security personal, Dr is the customer, customer is king.
933.
by matz1 7y ago
The better approach would be to automatically filter email containing dangerous link, or automatically prevent whatever dangerous thing that happen when that link is clicked. Is it hard ? Sure, the goal is to maintain security without creat
934.
by matz1 7y ago
Yes password are annoyance, friction and waste of time. Not to mention 2FA that is worse. For the Dr, his upmost concern is to treat the patient not deal with extra layer of annoyance. As an IT or security personel your job is to support th
935.
by matz1 7y ago
Serious
936.
by matz1 7y ago
Its the IT job to provide security without having to inconvenience the user. you can't just add extra layer of inconvenience for the sake of security. Your ultimate goal should be to provide security without adding additional inconveni
937.
by matz1 7y ago
Yes but there is more and more programmer these days, not to mention increasingly easy to be outsourced to anyone in the world. If you are not doing extra then you are going to be outcompeted.
938.
by matz1 7y ago
Yes, even for such non passion company you still have to compete. It doesn't matter if the job if "easy", if there are 2 applicant which both are sufficiently qualified, the one which have that extra edge is the one who will
939.
by matz1 7y ago
Sure, but for you to get hired in such company you may still have to compete with other for the position. You may have to code outside work in your current job in order for you to have that competitive edge over other applicant when you app
940.
by matz1 7y ago
Not even tesla or dream house, sometimes to just coast and provide minimum for your self and your family require you to compete with other.
941.
by matz1 7y ago
Yes, whatever you choose there is always trade off.
942.
by matz1 7y ago
I agree but then you must acknowledge that by chosing to restrict yourself, you may lose competitive edge againts those who have no such restriction.
943.
by matz1 7y ago
Or maybe don't have such a stringent regulation ?
944.
by matz1 7y ago
No, just because some kids are harmed so they should not operate at all? Thats crazy.
945.
by matz1 7y ago
As for right now, the US economy as a whole is looking great. GDP number is good, stock market at high, etc but for most ordinary people those means nothing, they still suffer.
946.
by matz1 7y ago
Let say the chinese able to finished the research and achieve result then why can't then the original researcher or anyone just stole that again ?
947.
by matz1 7y ago
If you work in FANG like company, $5k spending on such a thing is nothing.
948.
by matz1 7y ago
Its a mutually beneficial transaction between the business and the customer.
949.
by matz1 7y ago
Sure, I will elect those who allow consent as I describe.
950.
by matz1 7y ago
That should be up to us (not government) to decide if such is allowed or not. >What we were discussing is that the consent is optional Yes the consent is optional, in the sense you are allowed to opt-out by not buying the apple or buying
951.
by matz1 7y ago
If you want to buy just apples then you should buy it from other seller who just sells apples.
952.
by matz1 7y ago
Google pay their engineer outrageous salary.
953.
by matz1 7y ago
Yes, there are saying information want to be free. These data should eventually be public anyway, yes including to insurance company. The solution should be even more transparency, rather than privacy. The sooner we embrace and adapt, the b
954.
by matz1 7y ago
That is how consent should work, if I don't consent I should not buy your apple. Buying your apple is optional, I'm not required to buy your apple. Opt-in is when I buy your apple. Opt-out is when I don't buy your apple.
955.
by matz1 7y ago
Every country has its own issue but for most people those issue above would not affect their life. I'm neither LGBT nor interested in politics so these are not that relevant so I would rank living in Singapore highly above USA. Perfect
956.
by matz1 7y ago
The thing is I am indeed voting with my dollar, I vote for few dollars cheaper and get it in two days instead of a week.
957.
by matz1 7y ago
Which is true that both sucks.
958.
by matz1 7y ago
That's the point, reading alternative perspective open up my mind.
959.
by matz1 7y ago
Yes, the point is company can't just charge arbitrarily high price, they are still restricted by competition and the willingness of the individual to spend.
960.
by matz1 7y ago
Sure, its painful to you , but there may exist some people who will describe it as pleasure instead of pain.

More ›