matz1

82 ms·

691.
by matz1 6y ago
I do not see programming language as English. Sure it may use alphabet and borrow some english word but to me it still hardly english.
692.
by matz1 6y ago
He is not worong, the coronavirus is not as scary as being reported. The death rate are very low.
693.
by matz1 6y ago
>Asynchronous communication across timezones has not been solved True, but the workaround is I'm willing to adjust my work hour to fit my team. In a big city, life can still be 'lively' during the night.
694.
by matz1 6y ago
That's due to the over reaction: the lockdown
695.
by matz1 6y ago
I would call this epic over reaction. The actual virus is not as scary as being reported in the news. The death rate are very low. If this virus has death rate like ebola then that would be really is a disaster.
696.
by matz1 6y ago
Responsibility proper is subjective. >Dictators are responsible for the death of millions. The Dictators very well may believe that their action is the proper responsibility (According to him). My point is you can't simply ask them
697.
by matz1 6y ago
>It would not be illegal price collusion if every auto maker came to the same conclusion: raise prices They could, until one of them try to out compete other by lowering price.
698.
by matz1 6y ago
The poster doesn't defending Zuckerberg, merely trying to explain why Zuckerberg did what he did. >If you have power, you have responsibility: full fucking stop. No, if you have power you get to decide the rule. Same as drunk drivin
699.
by matz1 6y ago
There is no such prohibition. They can set their own price or even different menu.
700.
by matz1 6y ago
The price of the item is real for me. Limited scope? Sure, its for my benefit and my convinience.
701.
by matz1 6y ago
I agree, I'm discussing the case where the fee is unavoidable.
702.
by matz1 6y ago
I am specifically discussing about comparing net price, nothing to do with price margin though.
703.
by matz1 6y ago
I agree that price corelate to quality. My point is if restaurant A sell burger for $1+$9 fee, restaurant B sell burger for $9+$1 fee, I would judge the quality of these 2 the same way. Just because restaurant A burger cost $1 (for the rest
704.
by matz1 6y ago
>if the restaurant was paid zero by the app but the app somehow got their food, you’d be be okay with it If I'm the customer: yes. If I'm the restaurant: no, I would not agree to give out food if I'm getting paid zero. &gt
705.
by matz1 6y ago
It works the same way as for the worker, if you pay is $10 but they took $9 then for the worker the pay is really is $1, no different then if the bos pay $1 with 0 deduction. Then what the worker do is to decide whether it worth to do the j
706.
by matz1 6y ago
I care, so I judge the quality according to the money I paid to obtain it, in this case I judge it as $10 quality burger.
707.
by matz1 6y ago
Why does it matter though? it doesn't matter if the burger cost $1 + $9 fee or $9 + $1 fee, from my perspective the burger cost $10.
708.
by matz1 6y ago
Some restaurants figured that out, they simply have different the menu price displayed on the delivery app or even different menu set. For customer who prefer lower price they can order directly with the restaurant.
709.
by matz1 6y ago
Sure, but most people not going to notice.
710.
by matz1 6y ago
>you're still very likely to infect other people and contribute to the spread True, if you are scared then by all mean isolate yourself, do not meet other people. >causes extra deaths Assume, in the worse case everyone infected,
711.
by matz1 6y ago
The virus is not gonna disappear but it doesn't mean you are going to be infected as well. If you do infected, doesn't mean you are going to have the symptom. If you do have the symptom, doesn't mean you are going to have sev
712.
by matz1 6y ago
Do not relay on one solution, diversify. Have a backup plan. Assume that whatever it is you rely on has possibility to dissappear anytime for any reason.
713.
by matz1 6y ago
>companies only get into trouble if they do this on a significant scale This is where they are being forced do to it. The point is a company should do it if they could get away with it without trouble.
714.
by matz1 6y ago
>a company could pay women less since it knows they are less likely to demand an equal salary Except they couldn't, FB is forced to pay equal salary. >is not charitable act it's a responsibility Depends on which perspectiv
715.
by matz1 6y ago
> shouldn't the pay remain the same No, because facebook is a a company not a charity. If they can pay less amount for equal work, they should. Similarly I would not pay more for a haircut if there is cheaper barber with equal value
716.
by matz1 6y ago
That is how thing should be. Let say I shop for a gadget. I pay for that gadget not because the value it deliver but the least amount required to get the value it deliver.
717.
by matz1 6y ago
what youtube decide the list of video when you go to www.youtube.com is the content curation. Its a very important feature.
718.
by matz1 6y ago
What do you mean no one is working ? There'll still be people working.
719.
by matz1 6y ago
The point is Bob doesn't need to work.
720.
by matz1 6y ago
Automation, immigrant, increase pay.

More ›