matz1

68 ms·

721.
by matz1 6y ago
But that is just life isn't it ? Whatever choice available there will be trade off, there will be pros and cons.
722.
by matz1 6y ago
Language is fluid, never static.
723.
by matz1 6y ago
Just like you I'm challenging your usage of the word.
724.
by matz1 6y ago
> You literally have to satisfy everybody You literally don't have to. You can just ignore some of them.
725.
by matz1 6y ago
>it is falsely claiming to be OSS There is no single entity that own the word open source >If you want to say that it is being released as "source available" no one would complain Just like everything else, I totally underst
726.
by matz1 6y ago
standard according to who ? OSI? I disagree with them. There is no sole absolute authority of a word meaning.
727.
by matz1 6y ago
Useless to you maybe, not everyone has the same purpose. Ok so for the purpose of "shared understanding", let use my preferred definition of open source then.
728.
by matz1 6y ago
>So I can just decide that "Donald Trump is a space alien" actually means that I'm gonna go buy a burger today, and this isn't going to mislead anyone at all Yes you can, some people will hate it some people will like
729.
by matz1 6y ago
I'm suggesting language is fluid, never static.
730.
by matz1 6y ago
Thanks but I prefer the word "open source".
731.
by matz1 6y ago
You can always try to brought any one for any reason to a court, doesn't mean you will succeed.
732.
by matz1 6y ago
Just because it's widely use doesn't mean anything. No one as monopoly or single authority of open source definition.
733.
by matz1 6y ago
Likewise, there are good reason for flying to visit relatives. Maybe not the reason that you like. Driving inheritely carry risk of accident. >If everyone had the attitude that they were going to "continue living their lives",
734.
by matz1 6y ago
>Does the US have no absolutely mechanism at all for restricting travel if there is an emergency? I certainly hope so. I wouldn't support such mechanism. Yes, like anything, I understand there would be trade off.
735.
by matz1 6y ago
>Wouldn't you want your extra effort to pay off? Yes of course I would always want to make more. For example: The company can say my pay is $100 but then after some complex calculation, I get $50. I don't care how they calculat
736.
by matz1 6y ago
Why would it be? that it madness.
737.
by matz1 6y ago
>and I would ask them about DoorDash's pay model. Why is this matter though? at the end of the day, what matter is my final net pay. It doesn't matter if the company take all my tip or deduct something, or some other complicate
738.
by matz1 6y ago
Maybe because it bring more money by emphasizing good. So if they doing it for money, it make sense to emphasizing good.
739.
by matz1 6y ago
The word meaning can always evolve, at another point for whatever reason the open source may not be the same as what you prefer. No one own the sole authority of the word usage. There won't be single uniform definition.
740.
by matz1 6y ago
The rationale is people can have different opinion, preference, thinking. People do not always agree with a single definition. No entity has sole authority of a meaning open source.
741.
by matz1 6y ago
In the sense of you can see the source, it is open source. Not everyone will agree with your definition of open source.
742.
by matz1 6y ago
um yes, guest order delivery food all the time. How is it going to be smelly ? the food is most of the time is inside a container, box or similar.
743.
by matz1 6y ago
Yes. How is it awkward?
744.
by matz1 6y ago
Going to work doesn't mean you are going to be infected. Being infected doesn't mean you are going to have the symptom. Having the symptom doesn't mean its going to be severe symptom. Having severe symptom doesn't mean
745.
by matz1 6y ago
I'm Elon musk fan too >what about "duty of care" to his staff? Its not like Elon harm his staff by opening, >Also what other laws can he (or anyone else) choose to violate? In general, every law can be violated, broken,
746.
by matz1 6y ago
As a company it is exactly what Tesla should be concerned of. Tesla is not charity.
747.
by matz1 6y ago
Of course Tesla factory workers would not be excited about it. With or without pandemic, working in factory is not something most people want to do if they have option to stay home. The factory worker opinion is largely irrelevant, in this
748.
by matz1 6y ago
Every topics is debatable, on the basis that no everyone think the same way, even scientific method. You would think mathematical statement such as 1+1=2 is obviously true, the absolute truth ? No, its still very much debatable, people can
749.
by matz1 6y ago
even those two reason still make sense for car.
750.
by matz1 6y ago
yes

More ›