matz1

56 ms·

511.
by matz1 6y ago
It doesn't but still have non zero chance to kill other people.
512.
by matz1 6y ago
How do you come up with this number?
513.
by matz1 6y ago
I understand that, that is the case with any infections diseases but covid death rate are very low. Most people are either asymptomatic or only have mild symptoms. Do you drive personal vehicle at all ? However safe you are you have non zer
514.
by matz1 6y ago
I'm not a music fan but if I were I absolutely will go. The risk are minimal. The virus spread easily but not that dangerous. In fact I've been living my life as normal as I could possibly do all these times.
515.
by matz1 6y ago
Without the lockdown the the hospital system are not overwhelmed, at least no more overwhelmed than what happen in the past. Due to lockdown the hospital are furloughing, lying off nurse, freeze hiring. Just look at Sweden where they didn&#
516.
by matz1 6y ago
>Small but non zero for death. Of course, there always non zero probably of death for anything. >There seem to be other nasty long term effects that are mostly unknown. Of course, it could happen with any other diseases >The idea t
517.
by matz1 6y ago
There are very very small chance that your kid will negativity by covid let alone death.
518.
by matz1 6y ago
I mentioned that flu may not kill as much as covid. >there was not a global lockdown for the 2018 flu season Yes, so despite that there are thousand of death due to flue and hospital overwhelmed, somehow is was acceptable to not have loc
519.
by matz1 6y ago
>the flu does not overwhelm hospitals yes it does https://time.com/5107984/hospitals-handling-burden-flu-patie... flu may not kill as much as covid or spread as fast as covid but still thousand of people die every y
520.
by matz1 6y ago
I'm criticizing the decision to shutdown, so we should ban rebar ? ban construction ?
521.
by matz1 6y ago
>Why would anyone choose the first option? True if there is no downside, but I can easily think few benefit going to gym : - some sports can't be done indoor - some sports can't be done alone - some sports require equipment tha
522.
by matz1 6y ago
Bad policies deserve to be violated. > Please consider reporting the details to the appropriate authorities No, on the contrary I'm encouraging people to go out and resume their normal activities.
523.
by matz1 6y ago
Some sports can only be done indoor. Nothing to do with body dysmorphia or doing something "illegal" but based on the fact that covid is not as severe that warrant stopping recreational activity. Is simply risk vs benefit.
524.
by matz1 6y ago
>but it's sure convenient to say we should do nothing I didn't say we should do nothing. There are things that can be done other than lockdown such as finding vaccine still have to be done, improving treatment method still have
525.
by matz1 6y ago
All diseases could cause long term effect in some of the population. Flu can cause long term damage too. Do you know what else could cause long term damage ? Lockdown >still not well understood Especially when is still not well understoo
526.
by matz1 6y ago
>172,000 dead Thats such a low number ~0.05% of the population. This should viewed as good news that the virus is not that deadly.
527.
by matz1 6y ago
The chance of getting infected and having serious symptoms is very very low. I don't need restaurant to do any special measure.
528.
by matz1 6y ago
If you look the number case, yes it can be considered "high" because the virus spread easily but then again you see vast majority of it is either asymptomatic or only have mild symptoms, it doesn't make sense to lockdown.
529.
by matz1 6y ago
780K out of 7.8 billion = 0.01% that is very low and over time death rate will be lower because of increasing number of immunity on the population and better method of treatment.
530.
by matz1 6y ago
>The government's job is to protect the health and safety of the community, right? Yes but we can't ignore the damage caused by lockdown. Lockdown is not without downside, it incur immense cost and long term damage. Lockdown is
531.
by matz1 6y ago
>I’m curious, do you mind being more specific about what “realistically and appropriately” means in this context? Exactly how did the media miscommunicate the severity of COVID They should emphasize on recovery rate and the fact that for
532.
by matz1 6y ago
yes, just tried again, same issue. stuck at "Importing..." forever. I looked at the dev console. Access to XMLHttpRequest at ' https://api.dropbase.io/v1/pipeline/HhNFQmZnnFkjrqK6Lptr3w/l... fro
533.
by matz1 6y ago
>1) effective Maybe if the virus is as deadly as anthrax or ebola, but for covid its not worth it.
534.
by matz1 6y ago
tried to import csv from file, failed. there was CORS error shown in the dev console.
535.
by matz1 6y ago
I don't want to back to the office has nothing to do with covid. After all I never stop going to the gym, restaurant all these time, albeit secretly. Its that I prefer to work from home. My job doesn't require anything thing that
536.
by matz1 6y ago
Yes of course there will be, any diseases could cause long term health conditions in some of population. Flu too can cause long term damage too. But does it justify lockdown ? closing down school ? No. Especially when its still unclear and
537.
by matz1 6y ago
So what if its outbreak? Why afraid? We know by now that vast majority of people will be fine.
538.
by matz1 6y ago
Is the policy is to have 0 death and to ignore the damage from lockdown? Then yeah its not the best policy.
539.
by matz1 6y ago
Sure, I will totally support such implementation that neither restrict people movement nor have occupancy restriction, at least for this specific virus. If let say covid has severity of anthrax or ebola then restricting people movement mayb
540.
by matz1 6y ago
Lockdown maybe necessary if covid has severity of ebola, but with such low death rate ? Its overkill, the damage due to the lockdown is greater than the covid.

More ›