matz1

59 ms·

541.
by matz1 6y ago
I have answered your question.
542.
by matz1 6y ago
I would gladly send my kids to school. If you really really that paranoid, you can try home school them.
543.
by matz1 6y ago
Every country called it differently. Partial lockdown is still lockdown
544.
by matz1 6y ago
Lockdown cause massive unemployment, bankruptcy, mental health issue, kids not getting proper education, delayed treatment/care for non-covid cause, etc. All this for what ? for the virus that for vast majority of people if you do get
545.
by matz1 6y ago
If its unclear yet then don't shut down school ? Its clear that there are risk of closing school.
546.
by matz1 6y ago
agree, i wish government around the world would think the same.
547.
by matz1 6y ago
So you want to drain your profit to match the salary? I would think it would cause issue with the shareholder and when you want to pay for other future non salary expense, but fine lets ignore that. But what if China simply offer more salar
548.
by matz1 6y ago
Are you suggesting to move some of the CEO allocation to the engineer ? Wouldn't that cause new issue of retaining CEO ?
549.
by matz1 6y ago
How can you simply offer 3x salary ? Where the money come from ?
550.
by matz1 6y ago
How ? TSMC literary doesn't have unlimited money.
551.
by matz1 6y ago
Of course every decision in life will always have its own trade off. Sure it can have severe impact on their career but its still a choice whether to do or not to do, quit or not to quit
552.
by matz1 6y ago
Ethics are subjective and always evolving. I think Engineering ethics is not to tell you what to build or not to build but rather to tech you what is the likely outcome if you decided to build x or not to build x. Based on that its up to yo
553.
by matz1 6y ago
>But they don't make money from the phones. Its not all bad, they don't and shouldn't limit themselves by relying on making money on one particular method anyway.
554.
by matz1 6y ago
Yes that's the point, google can still have make money despite samsung copying by using different strategy.
555.
by matz1 6y ago
>Being the original creator doesn't mean much when others can copy your design and not pay any of the costs associated with developing it in the first place yes, it doesn't much if you don't know how to monetize it. >It
556.
by matz1 6y ago
Sure but doesn't mean Apple or whatever company that being copied can't make money too.
557.
by matz1 6y ago
You can but you are in mercy of Apple for the product roadmap or future update and you may not understand the product as intimately as Apple. They may also have server side components that would be very difficult to copy.
558.
by matz1 6y ago
Like I said, if you are the original creator you have advantage the copier doesn't have. Another way is to provide customized personalized solution. That would be very hard to copy. How is these pathetic? Either way you have to adapt o
559.
by matz1 6y ago
Some strategy I can think of: be the first to market, market yourself as the original creator, constant innovating, other people can copy but they can't control the updates and product roadmap, and you have the advantage of intimate kn
560.
by matz1 6y ago
>People who create need to be able to benefit from that creation. I agree, its just the strategy can be changed to not rely on IP.
561.
by matz1 6y ago
Maybe try do the same thing? Less regulation, more factory, more monitoring doesn't always mean bad thing. Cheap worker can probably be replaced with advance automation. I disagree that its a "stealing", you still have the kn
562.
by matz1 6y ago
>I can't see an answer outside of decoupling Maybe stop relying on IP as your business strategy ? Always be innovating so that you always be one step ahead those who copying.
563.
by matz1 6y ago
Going to school is unlikely to be fatal either. The benefit of going to school is greater than the risk of covid. If you are really really that paranoid, you can home school your kids.
564.
by matz1 6y ago
It would be worse if Sweden did implement lockdown.
565.
by matz1 6y ago
um yes, it would be very good.
566.
by matz1 6y ago
Sadly what you said make sense. If its true then its likely this will be over after the election.
567.
by matz1 6y ago
Its baffling that lots of government still want to continue the lockdown.
568.
by matz1 6y ago
>not having symptoms or being low death rate doesn't mean shit. It means a lot, its a good news, it means the virus is not that dangerous. >On top of that we don't know the long term effects of this thing Sure but there also
569.
by matz1 6y ago
Grandma may or may not get it, even if she get it doesn't mean she is going to be 100% die. Given her age, any small diseases could kill her.
570.
by matz1 6y ago
>If I told you that every day you lived your normal life, you had a 1 in 100 chance of dying, would you take it Of course, in fact that I'm doing right now, i try to lived my normal life as much as i still possibly can. >The brea

More ›