Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
maratd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
331.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
A cab company couldn't sit on AIM? I would pay in person once the cab arrives. Having all your shit in one place isn't exactly a new paradigm.
332.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> Last time I visited China I paid for cab rides and bought electronics all within wechat with minimal setup. The mobile commerce maturity and convenience that comes with wechat is years ahead of what Silicon Valley offers. What? I was a
333.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
It doesn't even have to be hover. You can do click-based stuff using hidden check-boxes. CSS3.
334.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> If you haven't watched it since HS like most people, I'd encourage you to watch it again. Just did, available on Amazon Prime for streaming. Just as good as I remembered. > There is nothing noble about hiding a heart condi
335.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> It's strange how this sort of sentiment appears whenever you talk about genetics, yet I never see anyone praise the virtues of imperfection when it comes to taking prenatal vitamins or not eating too much fish during pregnancy. Th
336.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
Those who haven't seen it, should definitely see Gattaca. Good movie, but aside from that, posits a premise that I think will resonate with virtually everyone. That we are more than the sum of our parts. That there are unquantifiable a
337.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
Here is what I said: > And thankfully those that do, only do so from their immediate peers. As in, while the bot absorbed everything from everyone, people generally only listen to their immediate peers. As in, their friends, neighbors, f
338.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> What you're discussing doesn't seem grounded in modern ML/AI Do you have an example of a machine learning algorithm that doesn't involve trial and error? Because any trial and error system will require you to keep t
339.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> I disagree. I disagree that you disagree. I think I pretty much said what you did in the first half of your comment. > it's stored in memory where bits and pieces of it will be forgotten or misremembered ... The human mind lear
340.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
More context here: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/433238/disney-georgia-...
341.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> It's possible the system wasn't even performing online learning I suppose it depends on how you define learning. Based on how the algorithm failed, I'm guessing it was simply absorbing every piece of info thrown its way,
342.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
Not true. We're starting to identify the mutations responsible. There's nothing subjective about that.
343.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> People want a concept of mental disorder that is "objective". That's not possible. With a bit of effort, I think it is. I disagree with your definition of a disorder. A disorder is anything that negatively impacts an ind
344.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
Let me add a bit more then. It doesn't matter why you're closing yourself off. You start wondering about the why, you'll set out on the path of trying to figure out what people are thinking ... and let me skip to to the end
345.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
You'll see a few tips and tricks that are useful. Like when a person crosses their arms, they generally disagree with what you are saying, etc. The most important thing is to pay less attention to the content and more attention to th
346.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> Large companies can afford the complexity but small companies typically can't. I love the idealism, but that's not how it works. Small or large, you will hire a company that specializes in customs to handle all the paperwork
347.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
The article is not talking about the millions of domain names registered for the sole purpose of reselling them for a few bucks more. It's talking about domain names desired by BIG companies. Companies with functional legal departments
348.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
How are you a domain squatter if you owned the domain before the company existed?
349.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
Would you like to explain how you'll guarantee that those keys won't end up in the wrong hands? I trust those keys with Apple far more than the FBI.
350.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> there's a clear reason for this order to be executed No. They are abusing a law written two centuries ago to compel a private corporation to perform work on their behalf when they have the resources and know-how to do it themselve
351.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> Anybody rooting a car is betting both their life and those of the people they encounter on their technical skill. Yes? So is every guy who pops his trunk and starts working on the car? And people have been doing that since the very beg
352.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
This is true. It's also true that I can access service manuals for BMW and Audi. However, I cannot access the service manuals for Tesla. Because I don't live in Massachusetts. Does that seem right to you? They even make sure to ve
353.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
I never said the hacker shouldn't be liable. I said he shouldn't be criminally liable. By your logic, if the manufacturer puts out software that is responsible for a death, would you throw the software developer who wrote in jai
354.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
There is such a thing as criminal negligence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_negligence In your case, the person was being reckless. I don't think gaining access to hardware you own can be considered reckl
355.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
That's not what the OP said. He didn't say anything about downgrades. All he said was rooting and presumably, messing with the system. Neither qualifies as criminal negligence in my mind. I'm not sure I want to live in a soci
356.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> Would you agree that this extraordinary technical ability individual should be criminally liable in this case? No. There's no mens rea. He should be liable for damages in civil court.
357.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> Would you agree that this extraordinary technical ability individual should be criminally liable in this case? No. Cars have had software for a while. Tesla is the FIRST and ONLY company to do over-the-air updates. I don't think y
358.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> No malice be involved, just prudent reaction. It's not malice, it's panic and it's profoundly stupid. Only those with root access to the car can access the secret info. There are a handful of people out there who roote
359.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
> The guy's own post [1] said it was "pending" (e.g. downloaded and ready for an automatic update), not installed. This is correct. It was an attempted downgrade. He stopped it. > it's much more likely that it was
360.
▲
by
maratd
11y ago
Elon Musk != Tesla Or at the very least, Elon Musk is the voice of Tesla, but there are many other people who work there. You judge a company by their actions, not their words. I'm a huge fan of what they're doing, but not necessa
More ›