4 ms·
> I disagree. I disagree that you disagree. I think I pretty much said what you did in the first half of your comment. > it's stored in memory where bits and
by maratd 11y ago
> I disagree.
I disagree that you disagree. I think I pretty much said what you did in the first half of your comment.
> it's stored in memory where bits and pieces of it will be forgotten or misremembered ... The human mind learns very differently than a computer.
I can easily create an algorithm that introduces random corruption to the database, albeit in a controlled manner. You'll certainly get quirky personalities that way, which I suppose is the desired effect?
- rgbrenner 11y agoI think I pretty much said what you did in the first half of your comment. You said: it was simply absorbing every piece of info thrown its way, categorizing it, and then incrementing a counter in a database. Honestly, I think this is how most people learn. That is the opposite of what I said. People do not "absorb every piece of info thrown" their way.
- maratd 11y agoHere is what I said: > And thankfully those that do, only do so from their immediate peers. As in, while the bot absorbed everything from everyone, people generally only listen to their immediate peers. As in, their friends, neighbors, family, etc. Which part of that do you disagree with?
- rgbrenner 11y agoPeople don't absorb every bit of information, even when it's from friends, neighbors, family, etc. This is actually part of the communications field. Here's a page that talks about how people communicate information and several of the issues: http://www.msucommunitydevelopment.org/effectivecommunication.html http://www.msucommunitydevelopment.org/effectivecommunicatio... there's plenty more if you want to search for communication filters