Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
maallooc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
121.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
Wow. That’s textbook bad engineering. Could’ve done guid.nonexistanttld but they just had to do guid.com!
122.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
Care to elaborate?
123.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
I hope wireguard improves it’s tooling. It feels a bit crude for me.
124.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
It's an irony that in 1960 we believed oil would be extinct on 2000. Turns out we are drowning in them in 2000+20.
125.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
Well it's pretty simple. I treat news from EFF the same as I treat news from huffpo and buzzfeed. Pretty easy to draw a conclusion, I think.
126.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
You see, that’s why xkeyscore is illegal .
127.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
I’d say somewhere between huffpo and buzzfeed.
128.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
Sterilize? Sure. But after it the mask won’t be able to filter on N95 level.
129.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
I want to scream out: Why the f would you want to do that?
130.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
> Using a browser that the company depends to make money on Who thought this was good for the first place?
131.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
Wow, and I thought 2008 was pretty bad.
132.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
Without even looking at the article I guessed he was a javascript developer. And I was right.
133.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
Counterargument #1, #2 is due to the government's stance towards China. The government is trying to win back China's (so called) friendship, which was shattered when the U.S. deployed THAAD there. South Korea was able to handle th
134.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
N7+ EUV is 1.2x denser but also it's yield is horrible according to sources. https://wccftech.com/tsmc-7nm-euv-yield-alleged/ And you can't compare tsmc vs Intel directly because their target chip size is dif
135.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
https://en.wikichip.org/w/images/thumb/5/5c/7nm_densities.sv... Because their 10nm is denser than tsmc's so called 7nm ?
136.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2020-08/ Link seems broken.
137.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
I disagree. Intel’s capacity needs are huge, to the point where the benefits of outsourcing just can’t happen. Also, it’s not a good idea to rely on others, because they can screw up. Remember 28nm and the graphics fiasco? Sure, the costs w
138.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
> Maybe in 4-5 years, AMD will be the dominant player. But it's still too early to call them this. Highly unlikely. This is AMD's prime time because Intel screwed up, and they've peaked at 15%. I predict Intel to gain the
139.
▲
by
maallooc
7y ago
Those SoCs were designed exclusively for Apple products by Apple and Samsung. They were branded Samsung because then Apple failed to notice the importance of brand power of APs.