Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
la_barba
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
What is the basis of judging this program as satisfactory?
62.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
"Conversely, continuous CR has also been associated with depleted circulating leukocytes, immunosuppression, and reduced bone density (Devlin et al., 2010; Ritz et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2016; Villareal et al., 2016)." (CR = calo
63.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
I already addressed this in the previous comment. You might have missed it. >> Amazon provides a service of its own volition, and he took advantage of that service. >If the action that Amazon took could be proven to be "just a
64.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
>If Amazon added an animation to the existing audiobook content - making it a video - and then added captions would that be OK? AFAIK, they would have to obtain prior permission from the copyright owner before re-distributing a modified
65.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
EULAs and those kinds of agreements have their own legal problems with how they can be enforced, so its best not to complicate things here ! >I should mention this looks like an extremely vague distinction, and it's not even mutuall
66.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
>If Amazon provisions the AWS VM for me, and runs the same software there, and then transmits the results back to my device for my own use, is that fair use? Did Amazon do it out of their own volition, or did you instruct them to do it?
67.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
The difference is that audio-books is a separate product category with its own pricing. Embedding text in a video is quite different IMHO...
68.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
>The cheaters and liars need to be penalized. You want Google to adjudicate on more things?! Now you're going to need an appeals process for when they get it wrong here as well.
69.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Its not that people don't respect it, its that they don't appreciate it. And the reason they don't appreciate it is that those things are invisible to the end user. How much extra money would you pay for an electrician or a m
70.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
But why would you want anyone to have to pay anything? Google is one of the richest companies. This should be simply the cost of doing business. Google wants to make money by removing humans completely. They should have to pony up the expen
71.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Hmm.. has anyone ever been sued for adding captions? I don't see how they would.. as far as the end user is concerned, the captions are embedded into the video, are not a separate performance or a product. Not exactly analogous to audi
72.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
You are conflating agency of action with the means of action.
73.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Not to mention all the CPU time that JS scripts eat up. The eco-impact of disabling JS world-wide will be significant...
74.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
> You don't value their product enough to actually pay for it. It's available on TPB? Well, sure I'll watch it, why not. No torrent? Too bad, I'll just watch something else. I don't buy that argument. Its analogo
75.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
If you want to break the law, then of course anything is possible. In any case, all you are doing by pirating is telling the media companies how badly you want their product. That is going to tell them to fight harder against piracy. The on
76.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Sorry, I don't wish to continue this pointless discussion. Goodbye and have a nice day.
77.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
I have no "position", what are you even talking about? You introduced a claim in this conversation. It would be nice to have the data to back it up, but sure, you can feel or think whatever you want. If you don't care to defe
78.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
>I'm not entirely sure how I feel about this. One the one hand it's a podcast targeted toward men, which I'm fine with. On the other hand, his whole thing is about open-mindedness so it doesn't seem quite right for hi
79.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Have you done that?
80.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
That is just psychology. You can deny it, but its still there. You can try to shape it, and cover it up with prim and proper etiquette, but its still there. A thousand years of civilization has nothing on a hundred thousand years of caveman
81.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
In total, how many people have been on his show and what are the stats? Do you happen to have that data?
82.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Other than assuming his accusations are flawed, how else would one "take into account" his motivations?
83.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Um, you can do the same with a memory card. Ask someone who knows. (Also, you can buy tires online)
84.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Which social media company would you believe regarding privacy?
85.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Which part are you having trouble with? Seems very simple and straight forward to me. Your "ordinary people" comment doesn't mean much TBH. It is no different than buying a tire, you have your speed rating, section width, loa
86.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
I wonder if Google will start banning accounts if you sent an email with offensive words..
87.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Fair enough :)
88.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Well, you were the one who said it was a cop-out. Are you not of that opinion any more? IMO, the culpability of the manufacturer should be zero for general purpose tools. For things like guns/weapons, which were invented solely for kil
89.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Without using a bias or metric, there is no way to filter a list of items. The only other option is randomness, and there is a notion of fairness to it, at least mathematically. Maybe the list could be 5 options chosen randomly. As long as
90.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Computers aren't "just tools", you can use them to stalk people online, harass them, hack into computers, etc, etc. Maybe Dell should be checking your mental history, criminal history before selling you a computer too? Just b
More ›