kshri24

8 ms·

91.
by kshri24 8mo ago
I can already tell this is probably some AI Microslop fuck up without even clicking on the article. EDIT: Worse than I thought! Who in their right mind uses AI to generate technical diagrams? SMDH!
92.
by kshri24 8mo ago
You can cut 90-95% of the slop posts by checking the project's GitHub repository. If it has .cursor / .claude folders it should be automatically pushed into a slow queue with the queue shifting every X hours. For example, this rea
93.
by kshri24 8mo ago
Can easily detect the AI slop. It is like how ads were splattered everywhere (and still do) in some old school websites and you would train your brain to ignore those ads. This is coming for AI slop as well. As more and more people realize
94.
by kshri24 8mo ago
Hilarious! Anthropic can just vibe code the boolean flag in.
95.
by kshri24 8mo ago
What worries me even more is tens of thousands (or even magnitudes higher) half-baked, over-hyped, vibe-coded spaghetti "open-source projects" released publicly for clout or to attract investment. It is like all the garbage papers
96.
by kshri24 8mo ago
> just use my evil technology Ridiculous to say the technology, by itself, is evil somehow. It is not. It is just math at the end of the day. Yes you can question the moral/societal implications of said technology (if used in a nega
97.
by kshri24 8mo ago
Agree with Karpathy's take. Finally a down to Earth analysis from a respected source in the AI space. I guess I'll be using slopocalypse a lot more now :) > I am bracing for 2026 as the year of the slopacolypse across all of gi
98.
by kshri24 8mo ago
Accurate and sane take! Current models are extremely good for very specific kinds of tasks. But beyond that, it is a coin toss. Gets worse as the context window goes beyond a few ten thousand tokens. If you have only vibe-coded toy projects
99.
by kshri24 8mo ago
Contributing to AI fatigue among consumers is not the way to retain shareholder value. Tastefully integrated AI is what will bring enthusiasm among consumers, which will generate REAL revenues (not inflated valuations) and have a direct imp
100.
by kshri24 8mo ago
Microsoft needs to go back to basics and keep the OS dead simple. No AI cruft. AI is good only for certain categories and specific ways of integration. It falls apart quickly if you do not know how to glue things together properly and just
101.
by kshri24 8mo ago
> That's not what that says. Just saw your replies to my comments. It does say that (cascade effect where tax is added to each stage of the supply chain): "The lack of exemption can make the business the end consumer, meaning t
102.
by kshri24 9mo ago
The entire library seems to be AI generated [1] [2]. Not sure how much of it was actually written by a human and how much of it was AI. [1]: https://github.com/ChartGPU/ChartGPU/blob/main/.cursor/age
103.
by kshri24 9mo ago
> I suspect big sellers must have dedicated account managers No clue how it is elsewhere but in Amazon India, the largest seller is Amazon itself which sells under a different name. That's their model. They were under scrutiny by th
104.
by kshri24 9mo ago
India will be chairing BRICS this year. And Trump decided to fuck with the wrong country, especially when India-US relations were at its peak. This year will mark the beginning of the end of USD as a global reserve.
105.
by kshri24 9mo ago
Corporate tax or even personal income tax is not the same as tax on cost of the product itself. As a corporate, I can structure my expenses in such a way that I never pay tax irrespective of whether the tax rate is 10% or 50%. There are way
106.
by kshri24 9mo ago
My answer is based on typical definition of what sales tax is. I have no idea how it is actually implemented in US and how it avoids tax pyramiding and if it actually can or not. But I know for a fact that ST has no concept of input tax cre
107.
by kshri24 9mo ago
> The US will have lost a lot of political goodwill by then Not really. All Governments across the World have undergone similar crisis in their own Countries, in different points in time in their own history, and know well to differentia
108.
by kshri24 9mo ago
> This isn't really any different than any other kind of taxes. You pay income tax and then pay sales tax using the money that was already taxed as income It definitely does make a huge difference. From sibling comment I got to know
109.
by kshri24 9mo ago
So that makes it even worse then because Sales Tax has no input credits to offset against.
110.
by kshri24 9mo ago
> The US has the second largest manufacturing base in the world after China. It's larger than India and is even slightly larger than the EU. Of only end products. The "largest manufacturing base" is misleading when majorit
111.
by kshri24 9mo ago
> whereas a domestic product costs There is hardly anything that is made domestically in the US. So the premise falls apart almost immediately. This premise works great for India where domestic production exceeds exports by massive margi
112.
by kshri24 9mo ago
Far from getting a break, you guys are paying tax on tax. You indirectly pay for import taxes every time your companies import raw materials needed to finish their goods (added value) and then that final value (cost of import + added value)
113.
by kshri24 9mo ago
You really don't need ANY study to know the obvious thing that tariffs are taxes on imports. It is being paid by Americans from DAY 1. The only difference being American Companies were taking the brunt of it all and it is now obvious t
114.
by kshri24 9mo ago
Agree with most of what you say. The only reason I say humans are different from LLMs when it comes to being a "black box" is because you can probe humans. For instance, I can ask a human to explain how he/she came to the con
115.
by kshri24 9mo ago
> A coder will write... or opt for different variations. Agreed. > People are inherently nondeterministic. We are getting into the realm of philosophy here. I, for one, believe in the idea of living organisms having no free will (or l
116.
by kshri24 9mo ago
I am not saying LLM sidesteps cause-effect. I am saying it is a black box. So yes "we just don't know it" is basically describing a black box.
117.
by kshri24 9mo ago
> Humans writing code are also non deterministic That's not what determinism means though. A human coding something, irrespective of whether the code is right or wrong, is deterministic. We have a well defined cause and effect pathw
118.
by kshri24 9mo ago
Explained here [1]. We live in a pseudorandom World. So everything is deterministic if you have the same set of input parameters. That includes trees as well. I am not talking about controllable/uncontrollable variables. That has no be
119.
by kshri24 9mo ago
Determinism is not strictly anti-randomness (though I can see why one can confuse it to be polar opposites). Rather we do not even have true randomness (at least not proven) and should actually be called pseudorandom. Determinism just means
120.
by kshri24 9mo ago
I wouldn't say it is a tree as such as at least trees are deterministic where input parameters (seed, environment, sunlight) define the output. LLM outputs are akin to a mutant tree that can decide to randomly sprout a giant mushroom i

More ›