4 ms·
The entire library seems to be AI generated [1] [2]. Not sure how much of it was actually written by a human and how much of it was AI. [1]: https://github.com
by kshri24 9mo ago
The entire library seems to be AI generated [1] [2]. Not sure how much of it was actually written by a human and how much of it was AI.
[1]: https://github.com/ChartGPU/ChartGPU/blob/main/.cursor/agents/webgpu-pro.md https://github.com/ChartGPU/ChartGPU/blob/main/.cursor/agent...
[2]: https://github.com/ChartGPU/ChartGPU/blob/main/.claude/agents/webgpu-expert.md https://github.com/ChartGPU/ChartGPU/blob/main/.claude/agent...
- bobmoretti 9mo agoGiven that the author's post and comments all sound like they were run through an LLM, I'm not at all surprised.
- janice1999 9mo agoThat was obvious before even looking at the repo because the OP used "the core insight" in the intro. Other telltale signs of these type of AI projects: - new account - spamming the project to HN, reddit etc the moment the demo half works - single contributor repo - Huge commits minutes apart - repo is less than a week old (sometimes literally hours) - half the commits start with "Enhance" - flashly demo that hides issues immediately obvious to experts in the field - author has slop AI project(s) OP uses more than one branch so he's more sophisticated than most.