kofddfjdfdfdff

6 ms·

1.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
But what would be incentives to using a PoS Bitcoin fork, as opposed to starting over with a fresh altcoin?
2.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
You see people firing up coal plants in your back yard? That's not an experience most people ever have.
3.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
Your comparison does not make sense, though. The question is, how many people who are not at risk from the disease do you have to vaccinate, and how many people are there who can not be vaccinated and would contract Covid-19. Let's say
4.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
Why do you say it is "deemed acceptable", if there is an ongoing discussion about it?
5.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
I should have added - risky for the person who might contract the disease. In any case, yes, both disease and vaccination have risks, that should be weighed against each other. Matters are complicated because risks differ among different ag
6.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
There is a nonzero risk to the vaccination. I really don't understand why you consider the plight of the people who can't get vaccinated, and dismiss the plight of the people who die or come down with severe disabilities from the
7.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
But what about the people who died from the vaccine? They don't bother you at all? I think their relatives are pretty distraught right now.
8.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
Mandating medical interventions is pretty much taking away someone's liberties. And your opinions about other people's opinions are also irrelevant as an argument.
9.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
But who draws up the social contract?
10.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
It's not a harmless vaccine. You want to mandate vaccinating people who are at no risk from the disease, and expose them to unnecessary risks. And that means children - all to protect sick people who for the most part are already isola
11.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
"One can either be part of society or not. Society has minimum requirements if one wants to participate" You make it sound as if there is a fixed, god given set of rules for society. That's not the case. Societies rules are c
12.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
Except that the people who are worried can simply get vaccinated themselves. There may be a few people who can not be vaccinated (old and very sick), but it hardly seems appropriate to restrict billions of people just to protect those few.
13.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
Even describing the lives of normal people would be interesting. The problem is that "feminist scholarship" carries a very real risk of history revisionism.
14.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
Because such books have an agenda behind them, unfortunately.
15.
by kofddfjdfdfdff 5y ago
So she was popular and so - that probably was true for many, many people throughout history. Not saying she wasn't a formidable thinker, but many people were and are. Only a few become famous because their inventions have long lasting