kodablah

52 ms·

541.
by kodablah 7y ago
I use it (Tor, not the browser as much) just to bust NAT to my local computer when sharing stuff. It's so easy to create an onion service that links to a local web server.
542.
by kodablah 7y ago
This is an important distinction in general. Many of the ills Aldi attempts to combat generally are non-existent in other grocery stores in some places, thereby only serving to inconvenience those customers for no gain.
543.
by kodablah 7y ago
In north Texas and Oklahoma, you'll find Aldi and WinCo as essentially neighbors.
544.
by kodablah 7y ago
> unknown in the US Commonly seen in the US in fact, such as in WinCo stores [0]. 0 - https://images.app.goo.gl/HN1mQyCw5fUbcnTr8
545.
by kodablah 7y ago
As an admitted traditionalist concerned more about consumer comfort than company, some of these are the reason I don't and wont shop at Aldi. It's funny because depending on who you talk to, some of the same things that are seen a
546.
by kodablah 7y ago
> I see market based solutions as only benefiting the supplier and always hurting the consumer The more I age, the more I recognize these things aren't absolute and recognize that the levels of benefit/harm are often nuanced to
547.
by kodablah 7y ago
Agreed. Really, just an open/transparent SQL builder part and an uncoupled row scanner that can populate structs reflectively is the perfect middleground to work around the impedance mismatch that inevitably occurs using these magic OR
548.
by kodablah 8y ago
One could guess because "among the most" is more newsworthy than "above average". But a more cynical guess is self-fulfilling, i.e. media reporting encourages negativity/stress which begets the results and the focus
549.
by kodablah 8y ago
> I'm referring, of course, to AWS IAM, which absolutely is the worst form of cloud lock-in that currently exists, at least relative to the zero people who seem to be talking about it. I assume people don't talk about it becaus
550.
by kodablah 8y ago
Without new laws affecting the rest of us? Sounds good. More bad-company enforcement is better than more internet legislation on these issues at this time.
551.
by kodablah 8y ago
What makes this approach lower latency than, say, a centralized TURN server in one of those clouds?
552.
by kodablah 8y ago
> how is it okay (to even suggest) that personal devices of kids are so invasively monitored? It isn't. Sorry my sarcasm didn't come through clear enough, but what you're saying and disagreeing with is my point.
553.
by kodablah 8y ago
> I wonder if that would violate Mozilla's requirements? The real question is if you're allowed to use your own resolver that conforms to your requirements if they differ from Mozilla's, even if a bit buried from the defau
554.
by kodablah 8y ago
> Our plan is to select a set of Trusted Recursive Resolvers (TRRs) that we will use for DoH resolution in Firefox. Those resolvers will be required to conform to a specific set of policies that put privacy first. So can I manually set o
555.
by kodablah 8y ago
Curious, how does your school solve this with students' phones? Have y'all considered requiring mandatory monitoring apps? Or cell phone data jammers and requiring them use y'all's wifi and require a CA cert install?
556.
by kodablah 8y ago
There are differences which are worth noting. Any system shouldn't be considered open if test cases are held in secret (even if they are just implementation test cases). Opening the entire language and runtime is considered the norm th
557.
by kodablah 8y ago
> Oracle now provides the JDK under a 100% free and open source license Such altruism; Can they do this for the TCK? Why not? Maybe all of Graal then? That seems to be where many of the dev efforts went after some staff for those now-fre
558.
by kodablah 8y ago
> I don't really see the point in using Python syntax and then throwing in a handful of random differences that don't have anything to do with the domain you're working in I don't think it's using Python syntax,
559.
by kodablah 8y ago
Also, signaling is as easy as send/receive bytes between two browsers passing offer/answer that are easily json encodable.
560.
by kodablah 8y ago
> For the last 2 years I’ve been working on a web browser that now cannot be completed because Google, the creators of the open source browser Chrome, won’t allow DRM in an open source project. It can too be completed, you're just n
561.
by kodablah 8y ago
> Ideally two peers could use a pre-shared secret or an offline-signed message to authenticate instead You can easily share offers and answers that are encrypted offline. It's how you share (i.e. signaling) that's the problem.
562.
by kodablah 8y ago
> Does WASM have better performance than the JVM? If not, could it have better performance theoretically? Is it more secure? How much slower than a regular binary would it be? etc. Hard to answer as they're different domains. In the
563.
Serverless DNS over HTTPS (DoH) at the Edge(blog.stackpath.com)
46 points by kodablah 8y ago|22 comments
564.
by kodablah 8y ago
Been hoping a stdlib for WASM would spring up. So if I wanted to implement a WASI backend (e.g. on the JVM), are the function definitions I should implement here: [0]? I assume string, array, struct, etc layout in WASM mem is as C expects?
565.
by kodablah 8y ago
I think the next logical step is to give those of us who care on the desktop more info about what certs/chains are being used. While FF has extension support for viewing cert info, Chrome does not yet[0]. Once there, it would be reason
566.
by kodablah 8y ago
This is why he lost in Texas IMO. While from the outside looking in it can feel like it was unwinnable due to party-politics, from what I've gathered a lack of focus on issues also hurt (that and general disagreement with issues he did
567.
by kodablah 8y ago
It's a real question because the linked statement explicitly states the same rules are applied to all apps. One who may not acknowledge the obvious falsehoods can be excused for assuming the same rules are applied to all when told that
568.
by kodablah 8y ago
Reads to me like you have to get in a different car to shop at those other stores because one of your cars only drives to one store.
569.
by kodablah 8y ago
> The only time we have requested adjustments is when Spotify has tried to sidestep the same rules that every other app follows. So Spotify complains that the rules are draconian and the response is that everyone has to follow them? If a
570.
by kodablah 8y ago
> a lot Subjective... many believe it's hardly anything (i.e. basically free to them, which is an ok belief).

More ›