knollimar

4 ms·

1.
by knollimar 6d ago
These steps, but in many other arbitrary orders, some with feedback to previous steps
2.
by knollimar 6d ago
it's self inflicted Peter principle speedrun. Not even a heuristic like "could they do the job eventually" but they try to become incompetent immediately.
3.
by knollimar 8d ago
"make the player teleport to square 1,1 on move and the flag stay at 1,1" the LLM put the flag at 1,0. Not sure if this is the intent.
4.
by knollimar 10d ago
Aren't they literally being sued for taking it from Apple?
5.
by knollimar 11d ago
Gated by a provate company where they have no recourse if they ban you is an issue. Also they just repeatedly boil to frog with anti user experiences. No, I won't install your app!
6.
by knollimar 11d ago
You're too dumb to get your own point. Let me spoonfeed it back to you
7.
by knollimar 12d ago
It's contrarian in a sycophantic way. It'll agree with your main point and then arbitarily find something to bike shed over
8.
by knollimar 12d ago
Or it'll strawman your point in the most bad faith way possible and correct you by handing you back the words you meant...
9.
by knollimar 12d ago
Where I'd push back is that Claude isn't a contrarian, it's a pedant that likes to argue with you. It's not just disagreeing with your point but reframing your own point in a way that makes it correct and you wrong.
10.
by knollimar 12d ago
I'm saying they can't take shortcuts like prefabbing walls without the stuff that goes in walls in them or at lesst coordinated sleeved etc
11.
by knollimar 12d ago
You still have to solve all the MEPs so where does that go in your process?
12.
by knollimar 12d ago
Ever try putting a brick wall on a truck?
13.
by knollimar 13d ago
Ethically sure but that doesn't mean taking from them is nothing "illicit".
14.
by knollimar 13d ago
I'm sure they put some BS in their TOS
15.
by knollimar 13d ago
So have the open weight ones but faster? I don't have a horse in this argument but catching up doesn't imply the one in the lead has stagnated
16.
by knollimar 13d ago
I'm trying to teach a subordinate to draft and he keeps saying "this feels automatable" before he undedstands how to do it. I had to explicitly tell him "do not try to automate [particular task] before you know how to d
17.
by knollimar 16d ago
I meant the metaphorical iphone ones
18.
by knollimar 16d ago
It looks like you refusing when you call it's point stupid enough and ask it to think more when it keeps reasserting a bad point.
19.
by knollimar 16d ago
Are the yellow dots not opt in?
20.
by knollimar 18d ago
Haven't ram prices been a linear drop since 2010 before chatgpt rampocalypse? I don't think it's "still" anymore but perhaos some progress will be made in the model front
21.
by knollimar 18d ago
Glm 5.3 won't fit on a mac mini. The barrier to entry to host something scary is what, like $10k? 20k?
22.
by knollimar 19d ago
Was the animation objectively bad? like was it bad for the user and he was right or were you wronged?
23.
by knollimar 19d ago
"I don't know what it means to "own website issues"" made me irate. It was very clear! Read the issues and be accountable for fixing them?
24.
by knollimar 19d ago
Upon further reflection, I realize there's two "impedance matching". I, and other EEs, will assume I mean the complex conjugate matching to redirect power toward load. The author is making the argument about minimizing refle
25.
by knollimar 19d ago
The first three examples they use are filters. The abstraction of impedance matching should be to "tune things to make them more efficient in their usability". Their examples don't sit with impedance matching to me. They&#x2
26.
by knollimar 20d ago
Surely the researcher has way more constraints and is thus less creative in their job? I'm all for finding the joy in things, but the author starts with the comparison and then uses the ability to find creativity with it being a requis
27.
by knollimar 20d ago
Rare like a steak not like a treasure.
28.
by knollimar 20d ago
"a clear mental image from the very first word" Nothing meaningful was said for 9 words. Objective consideration of contemporary phenomena compels the conclusion that the words appearing here could be anything
29.
by knollimar 20d ago
I think the grating one is that it's constructed to sound effective when it shouldn't! Good points should be rewarded confidence. I read so many not X it's Y where the distinction beteeen X and Y isn't relevant to the d
30.
by knollimar 20d ago
The most frustrating one is when it does the papering over analysis and adding pushback to seem helpful. No, there shouldn't be a spot "where you pushback" unless it makes sense and responds to someone's concern! Like w

More ›