knollimar

4 ms·

31.
by knollimar 1mo ago
Are you passing well organized layers?
32.
by knollimar 1mo ago
Well maybe they have another suspicipus theory for defense of your data. Like taking it, laundering it through a summarizer, and training on that. Surely that's less questionable than taking copyrighted stuff and saying "don&#x27
33.
by knollimar 1mo ago
"Beating opus" is the false part, no?
34.
by knollimar 1mo ago
Wait the 20x doesnt multiply the weekly?
35.
by knollimar 1mo ago
They gave a point that it sort of inverts tbe meaning
36.
by knollimar 1mo ago
The LEAN example is the ideal case. It's like a baby POC to me. I can only assume the only realistic way to get all the federated data will be a ton of massivr vertical consolidation of industry by hubris laden tech execs crossing ind
37.
by knollimar 1mo ago
Throw understanding images in there and it becomes less true in my experience. Sure they shit out code and search text well, but one infographic and they circle trying to rasterize it.
38.
by knollimar 1mo ago
Construction isn't using LLMs any time soon like that. We don't even send our files in structured data because everyone's playing nose goes for liability and sending pdfs
39.
by knollimar 1mo ago
I don't even think procrastination is laziness as you end up having to do the work later.
40.
by knollimar 1mo ago
A summary is distinct from reading it. It summarized fine, but that's not the thing. edit: upon it outputting a summary, asking it to reproduce as continuous prose it refuses. One shotting and asking not to summarize it complies? I hat
41.
by knollimar 1mo ago
Did you even try this? my claude refused, giving me some copyright-without-mentioning-copyright bs.
42.
by knollimar 1mo ago
the NY version of the law applies to CNC machines too
43.
by knollimar 1mo ago
The whole "government can't spy on you, but can pay a corporation to do it" is crazy. From requesting data from big tech to this, it's just wild. It feels like some juvenile "I can't kill you but I can pay thi
44.
by knollimar 1mo ago
I propose 1 session per day and 3 hours to ingest the slurry into your brain
45.
by knollimar 1mo ago
No, they're not sarcastic. It was an interesting point; if an idea succeeds well enough people just do it and make it "common sense". It's a point in the talk.
46.
by knollimar 1mo ago
If you want a spoilery TLDR: It's more about the journey. He tracks down the origin, finds the support, finds the support flawed, and leaves you to your own conclusion rather than make a new flawed one. The basic idea is that the orig
47.
by knollimar 1mo ago
They choose not to unless you beg them, and of course they double down on not running it once they suggest reasoning qbout it is sufficient.
48.
by knollimar 1mo ago
not the person you replied to, but the distinction between communication equipment vs press seems pretty small, no? Unless you're just saying the court disagrees, which is fair, but yuck
49.
by knollimar 1mo ago
Left NYC around when he got elected (non political, just a job offer) Does he market by his first name now? It seems overly familiar and parasocial to use it in titles if not
50.
by knollimar 2mo ago
Even vision? Thought k3 might have an edge there
51.
by knollimar 2mo ago
What's a computer?
52.
by knollimar 2mo ago
Saw like a leak or just speculation?
53.
by knollimar 2mo ago
But the stupid part of stupid shit doesn't apply to the electronics, while Gypsy singing is still loud
54.
by knollimar 2mo ago
Load bearing irks me having a construction background. Claude will often comment on it using the phrase wrong when it gets context.
55.
by knollimar 2mo ago
good advice; tbh I'm really trying to use counting as a proxy for "understand symbol, flag annotation next to it, associate annotation with symbol and store as object in location". Ideally, look at second diagram and see some
56.
by knollimar 2mo ago
You say "it can be trained" but they fail at counting in my use cases, let alone maintaining symbolic relationships. Can you point me at one that can understand a detailed block diagram? Frontier is fine, soliciting recommendation
57.
by knollimar 2mo ago
Then you have a separate issue where the LLM can't piece together 9 subimages well.
58.
by knollimar 2mo ago
If the harness does it that's just like saying "please use a workaround". You'll lose fidelity and LLMs will lose the ability to count things or maintain relationships for schematics, etc
59.
by knollimar 2mo ago
If the API accepts only 800 by 800, the aegument youre making is "fix it in the harness". I don't think the n by n subgrid fixes this the way most harnesses do, as it'll fail to count things if you have more overlap and
60.
by knollimar 2mo ago
Anything where there are symbols representing in space (e.g. schematics). Thats pretty broad

More ›