Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kllrnohj
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
631.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
Binary searching is quite slow and should be used sparingly but not because of branch misprediction necessarily but because of memory stalls - you're almost always guaranteed to have a cache miss during the search. Similarly for B-tree
632.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
I'm not sure how you'd actually pull that off. Are you configuring AMT with such settings? Don't you then end up with 2 IPs per MAC? Or is AMT given its own MAC? Seems messy regardless. Just having it be a passive server is m
633.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
> but I don't see any mention of the server itself. I mean how else does any remote management solution work? This is no different than IPMI?
634.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
> No good way to deactivate or prevent. Eh? https://software.intel.com/sites/manageability/AMT_Implement...
635.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
This is literally an above-the-fold advertised feature of vPro: > Remote Manageability > Remotely power up, update, and repair PCs outside of the firewall, even if they’re out-of-band1, to help your users from virtually anywhere. htt
636.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
> and they're expensive to maintain as they consume quite a bit of memory just to exist, even if you don't need it (due to how they must pre-allocate a stack which apparently is around 2MB initially, I'm not familiar with
637.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
That's a stdlib utility, not a language feature :)
638.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
That'll inevitably be a utility function that exists, but C++ generally prefers broadly useful language primitives over single-case helpers
639.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
In this case experts in their respective fields, at least that's the theory that was the justification for Chevron in the first place and it definitely held up just fine. As in, the doctors the FDA employs would be the ones primarily d
640.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
I'd argue a much more core issue is simply the primitive voting system guarantees a two-party system. The US desperately needs ranked choice voting which would inject diversity into the system, diversity that's necessary for survi
641.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
And what about the gap between a new thing existing and Congress taking an official stance on it? Should Bitcoin be unregulated simply because crypto didn't exist when the IRS and SEC were established, despite glaringly obvious similar
642.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
And what exactly happens in the meantime? That thing is now decided to be unregulated by the courts. There's no atomicity to "kick back to Congress" and Congress always had the power to override agencies regardless. This is 1
643.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
Which is a power grab by the courts. Instead of deciding if the agencies interpretation was reasonable, they now also decide if they like the decision in the first place. More power to the court == power grab, this is pretty straightforward
644.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
That is a completely incorrect understanding of Chevron. The courts under Chevron would immediately strike down the FDA attempting to regulate motor oil as that's not a reasonable interpretation of the regulatory laws that Congress cre
645.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
Reading the comments it's pretty clear that propaganda has been extremely successful. There's so many just completely wrong takes on both what Chevron was and what the result of this ruling is.
646.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
That's not what this does. This moved the power from agencies to the courts, not to Congress. Congress always had the ability to clarify or change the laws. The problem was how to interpret those laws. Under Chevron if the agency made
647.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
That's a misunderstanding of Chevron. Chevron said that if an agencies interpretation of the law was reasonable, it was deferred to. It did not let agencies do whatever they fuck they wanted unchecked. What the SC just said is in the c
648.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
> Your ambiguity may not be mine Which is what the courts decided. > Chevron deference was being used even when there was NO ambiguity. Because Chevron was a legal framework to decide if the agency should be deferred to or not. It
649.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
This is just wrong. Under Chevron you still had legal recourse, just the judges sided with regulation experts in ambiguity Also those federal agencies operate as matter of law. You don't really get to just have "disagreements&qu
650.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
> What the supreme Court is saying is that Congress cannot abdicate their power into an unelected bureaucracy. You mean, like the entire court system including the supreme court is? The courts interpret Congress' laws and they aren&
651.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
Getting good performance out of the GPU in general is regularly a memory problem. CUDA doesn't really help beyond documenting what is expected of you with regards to data layout and warp coalescing. https://docs.nvidia.com&#
652.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
> The Cortex A9 had 32 byte cache lines for one prominent counterexample. Ok, all arm-designed cores for the last 15 years then :)
653.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
all ARM-designed cores are also 64-bytes. It's not just an x86 thing
654.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
JIT languages tend to have the worst language-provided locality as they are often accompanied by GCs and lack of value types (there are exceptions to this, but it's broadly the case). And a JIT cannot re-arrange heap memory layout of o
655.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
To ensure that member is itself still aligned properly in "global space". The start of the struct is assumed to be universally aligned (malloc, etc.. make that a requirement in fact) or aligned for the requirements of the struct i
656.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
> Meta alone bought 350,000 H100 GPUs, which cost them $10.5 billion Right, which means you need about a trillion dollars more to get to a trillion dollars. There's not another 100 Metas floating around. > Apple is about to revam
657.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
Did you look at your own chart? There's no trend of 200% growth. Rather this last few quarters were a huge jump from relatively modest gains the years prior. Expecting 6 years of "merely doubling" is absolutely bonkers lol Wh
658.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
Nvidia's 2024 data center revenue was $46B. They got a long fucking way to go to get to trillion dollars of product.
659.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
> I don't understand why so many people think that if Apple didn't take a percentage cut of sales, prices would go down. Products are typically priced at what customers are willing to pay, which likely wouldn't change. You
660.
▲
by
kllrnohj
2y ago
> the line seems to have stopped with the M8, which is a 32c/256t part from 2017. Epyc Naples was also 32c and also 2017. 4- and 8-way SMT wasn't something AMD or Intel ever bothered with, no, but IBM also did with the POWER li
More ›