4 ms·

This is just wrong. Under Chevron you still had legal recourse, just the judges sided with regulation experts in ambiguity Also those federal agencies operate

• Molitor5901 2y ago
  in ambiguity You hope. Your ambiguity may not be mine, but that's not really the point. Chevron deference was being used even when there was NO ambiguity.
  • kllrnohj 2y ago
    > Your ambiguity may not be mine Which is what the courts decided. > Chevron deference was being used even when there was NO ambiguity. Because Chevron was a legal framework to decide if the agency should be deferred to or not. It's not itself a decision. Using Chevron deference doesn't mean the agency was decided in favor of, it means a series of questions was used to analyze if the agencies interpretation of the law was reasonable. Here's some reading on the matter assuming you actually care about facts instead of just trolling https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chevron_deference https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chevron_deference