4 ms·

I'm not sure how you'd actually pull that off. Are you configuring AMT with such settings? Don't you then end up with 2 IPs per MAC? Or is AMT given its own MAC

I'm not sure how you'd actually pull that off. Are you configuring AMT with such settings? Don't you then end up with 2 IPs per MAC? Or is AMT given its own MAC? Seems messy regardless. Just having it be a passive server is much simpler as it never needs to care how the packets got routed to it, it just responds in kind

yjftsjthsd-h 2y ago
To be quite clear, I don't believe anyone has implemented it like this, I was just spitballing theoretical possibilities. And yes, you're right, you'd probably need to make the ethernet port present 2 MACs so the management system can have its own independent network stack, unless I've forgotten some awful trick to get around that (which is possible; I can't quite remember how single-port servers host their LoM interfaces).