Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kjksf
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
71 ms
·
751.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
They are not doing anything wrong so I'm not sure why anyone is "accusing" them of something. I've read this post, what they do is clear and makes sense to me. Most of all it preservers "if the student doesn't
752.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
No, we don't misunderstand it. 10 lines per day is just rubbish. Here's an example: https://github.com/sumatrapdfreader/sumatrapdf is code written by 2 people (me and another guy). It's written, document
753.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
It wasn't Tesla. NTHSB investigated the crash and got this particular information with Apple's help.
754.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
You complain about his advice but ended up just repeating his first point: build something worth investing in. The rest is just a candid description of how the world works. There are way more people wanting VC funding that there is VC fundi
755.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
> who then advertised it as having those options That's what the dealer claims. Tesla claims this feature was never bought for this car. You can choose to believe one party or the other, but don't present that belief as a fact.
756.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
It won't. When you buy FSD and sell the car, the FSD stays with the car. This is a muddy situation where car was sold back to Tesla, dealer bought it from Tesla and sold to a third party. Dealer claims it bought the car with FSD from T
757.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
They don't. According to Tesla that feature was enabled by mistake and never paid for. Whether you believe Tesla, is another matter but it's not like they remove features people paid for.
758.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
> the end-user has no real control over End user has the same control as over any feature of the car. If you buy Tesla and then buy FSD and then sell that car to someone else, FSD stays with the car. It would be absurd if it worked any o
759.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
No, it wont.
760.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Could you share the name of that tool?
761.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
I second "Mom Test Book" (you can watch author's YouTube talks that cover the topic https://blog.kowalczyk.info/article/06817da6d15d429db3eec8f2... ). The thing is that most people think that idea validat
762.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
While I doubt that "Las Vegas tunnel is mostly under parking lots with no obstructions" is even close to represent reality, here's what Boring Company says on the subject: > With a typical minimum depth of 30 feet, The Bor
763.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
This bug, the HN thread and how hard it is to fix ( https://bugs.python.org/issue39318 ) is a pretty good argument against exceptions. A code that looks simple and correct has been hiding a very subtle bug because no one unde
764.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Advice from a fellow dev: add a crash handler and set it up for an automatic submission of crash reports (symbolicated callstacks of all threads) via HTTP POST to a server. Better yet, turn it into something that others can use easily by co
765.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Negative WeWork comments were about their business model, not their product. I worked out of both WeWork shared space and at Workshop Cafe. At WeWork you pay $350 per month (price varies) and get access to a shared space that is arranged li
766.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
The major reason people use threads is to speed up compute intensive tasks. Ideally, pure computation like the one in your example should get a speed up linear to number of threads. 2 threads -> 2x faster. 3 threads -> 3x faster, up t
767.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Go's assembler syntax is inherited from Plan 9 project, which started in late 1980 and first released in 1992. For context, gcc was first released in 1987 i.e. about the same time that Plan 9 started. Go authors didn't attempt to
768.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Seems like SpaceX's Starlink will have no shortage of business. It seems like a no-brainer to use space as a backbone haul for inter-continent traffic vs. physical cables. It might be slightly faster, it'll probably be cheaper, yo
769.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
The argument is not that we should trust Tesla to self-certify. The argument is that they have shipped 3 cars in Europe. All their cars got among the best, if not the best, crash test ratings by every government and non-profit agency that t
770.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Their job is still to sell cars. You can fool some people some of the time but not all people all the time. If people don't buy EV cars because dealerships anti-sell them, that's bad for car makers. Especially in Europe in China,
771.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
This is not just Ford and there are more studies like this, both in US and in Europe. See: * https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/us-auto-dealers... * https://www.coxautoinc.com/news/o
772.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Cursory look at recent checkins seems to indicate that he wrote all the code. As the copyright holder of the code he could re-license it the same way even if it was GPL.
773.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Or the company maintaining the grid will raise prices. If you had to make the choice between "no electricity to power my fridge, my lights, my laptop" vs "pay double for the electricity", you'll pay double. If peopl
774.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Here's something that will shock you: this story is false. Based on comments so far most people, even those defending Tesla, accepted the false premise that NHTSA decided to investigate Tesla on its own. That's not what happened.
775.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
For context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_headquarters_shooting If Tesla security had credible information that a recently fired employee who has already damaged the company greatly by leaking information to t
776.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Network of robotaxis has a wonderful quality of increasing utilization with density. It's a self-healing system: the more people use it, the more efficiently we can use it. Efficiency, it this context, is number of people we can transp
777.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Because in all of human history humans have shown zero interest in depriving themselves of things they want. I want transportation. You want transportation. Everyone wants transportation. You, me and everyone else wants to go to the beach,
778.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
When you use X and then a substitute Y arrives that is 10x cheaper and more convenient, you'll switch to it. Using robotaxi network will be much cheaper than total cost of owning a car, mostly because cars are dramatically underutilize
779.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
In every mainstream language I can think of `map foo myCollection` creates an intermediary map. Memory allocation is so expensive that making that copy is often more expensive that calling `foo` on each element. Sometimes making a copy is e
780.
▲
by
kjksf
7y ago
Here's what this research tells me: demand for transportation is much higher than the current use of transportation. Current use is limited by cost and convenience. Self-driving car is likely to fix both so it'll lead to more use
More ›