karlgkk

14 ms·

301.
by karlgkk 2y ago
I sort addressed this in my original comment but local police likely do not have access to an AFU vuln, and generally get it after it’s been patched. Then, they go on an unlocking spree. This prevents that
302.
by karlgkk 2y ago
If I’m reading this right: Reboot is not enforced by the SEP, though, only requested. It’s a kernel module, which means if a kernel exploit is found, this could be stopped. However, considering Apple’s excellent track record on these kind o
303.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> There is no good reason to force the choice of 72 hours on everybody. That's a user-hostile design decision. It apparently only triggers if the phone hasn't been successfully unlocked for three days. So, it really isn't
304.
by karlgkk 2y ago
I don't know where you live, but in the US it's basically understood by the courts that FaceID is not protected, but PIN is. So if your threat model includes the sort of attacker that has a phone exploit or the ability to confisca
305.
by karlgkk 2y ago
“I don’t know what I’m talking about but here’s my opinion.” Thanks for your contribution
306.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Skill issue. You had to do some actual research on the boards. I grabbed a few manuals and ended up with an asrock.
307.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> you will have to get old enterprise hardware to get ECC not true. xeon workstation and a bunch of amd chips support it
308.
by karlgkk 2y ago
That’s the funny thing though… historically, companies that have a technical lead but in a margin sensitive business tend to get crushed by anyone who can reduce those margins.
309.
by karlgkk 2y ago
I know there are a few hypervisor vendors that do heartbeats for C and D. You can use whatever solution you like as long as there's a fallback task.
310.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> and a crucial part of NVIDIA's DriveOS stack fwiw they have been working hard to support linux as a second option, and have been major contributors to Real Time Linux sooooooo
311.
by karlgkk 2y ago
There's a few vendors that sell FreeRTOS forks that have that cert. SAFERTOS is a very common one > mature tooling and ecosystem Amazon has been working on freertos for a long time > easy to hire experienced devs tbh if you'
312.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> Name/reputation still means a lot to some people, as does not learning yet another OS Great, people on QNX can keep using it. A stagnating user base doesn't make for a good business. > Not everyone cares if something is FO
313.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Don’t worry, they did that too a couple of years ago. They also lost their tenancy separation records.
314.
by karlgkk 2y ago
apex is a child’s toy language designed to do simple form building applications. It’s no surprise that LLMs excel in writing it
315.
by karlgkk 2y ago
I think their adjustment is very minor and only happens when you're looking directly at the camera. It's minor enough that you've almost certainly seen it and not noticed. She may have the setting disabled, or she may be look
316.
by karlgkk 2y ago
This is just wish.com ChatGPT
317.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> If you employ a gadget to lie about this This has been enabled on iPhones, by default, for like 5 years now. You never even noticed. Their implementation only does a small adjustment, which works so well that most people don't eve
318.
by karlgkk 2y ago
There are other implementations that do a better job, such as Apple and Google's. They also are less willing to correct eye contact when it's "out of range" so to speak.
319.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Apple does this on the iPhone, by default. When you're looking at someone's face on FaceTime, it modifies the position of your eyes to be looking directly at the camera - so the person on the other end sees you looking at them.
320.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> As a Tesla owner I can promise you there will never be reasonable human assistance infrastructure. As a Waymo user I can promise you that there is, and they have it.
321.
by karlgkk 2y ago
The control-free stuff they're rolling out is generally being trialed or used on very narrow routes - roads where they've even built mild infrastructure to make it easier for AVs.
322.
by karlgkk 2y ago
That is a very important question, to be honest. And it definitely seems like it's getting more and more difficult for all of the self driving companies to reach "that next step". > What if it’s one an hour now, one a day
323.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> Cruise had driverless robotaxis on the streets while they had 2.5 to 5 miles per intervention. [1] And they got (rightfully) pulled off the roads. > there are still some rough edges in rare cases Waymo has substantially lower interv
324.
by karlgkk 2y ago
A single person's evidence isn't helpful. People doing testing at scale of Tesla's solution (even the latest version), have found a few interventions happen an hour (or at least per day), especially on busy streets or in situ
325.
by karlgkk 2y ago
It's a slick design, but unless it's expected to be used in very limited scenarios, the lack of a control surface (or even how Tesla expects to build an OC) for edge cases is worrying.
326.
by karlgkk 2y ago
I appreciate the sentiment, but I suppose don't understand the point. 20 years ago, when consoles were powerful computers sold at a loss or low margin, it made more sense. Now though, Nintendo sells their consoles at a profit (and the
327.
by karlgkk 2y ago
No it’s because I like to drink tea while I work and I don’t enjoy the idea of splashing liquid into the fan intake of a $3500 computer
328.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Thanks for your contribution
329.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Yes, I do. It’s an amazing monitor and combination iPad. It’s very different than what is easy to describe - partially because it defies convention in so many ways - but I use it with my Mac and then will have mail and chat and music floati
330.
by karlgkk 2y ago
FWIW due to the cost and the ostentatious nature of the device, most of us won’t leave the house with one

More ›