karlgkk

18 ms·

331.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> in 30-40 years the only people writing Java will be retirees maintaining old banking systems? I kinda suspect that if Java is still around in 30 years, what we call Java will be - at best - vaguely recognizable.
332.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Yeah, usually it has a vendor brand slapped on it tbqh
333.
by karlgkk 2y ago
If you can’t understand why the control system for SOMETHING GOING TO SPACE needs an RTOS then I can’t even begin to have a conversation with you
334.
by karlgkk 2y ago
No? Because if you’re not in danger, you’re not being rescued. You’re just being transported. If I miss the last train across the bay, my uber isn’t rescuing me. I can always stay up to 5am by making a shady deal at the endup. But yeah, thi
335.
by karlgkk 2y ago
I can't tell if this a serious comment or not, but they need an OS with realtime guarantees. They have claimed to use linux in a rtos configuration, also probably have a redundancy and voting-based failover system.
336.
by karlgkk 2y ago
They did.
337.
by karlgkk 2y ago
did the point of the analogie fly over your head so completely
338.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Nobody said it wasn’t
339.
by karlgkk 2y ago
That’s definitely one of those easier said than done things, that someone who’s never tried to do will think. Publishers have benefits, there’s a reason some game, developers, and other type of media creators will eagerly sign away a big c
340.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Star citizen has been more or less shipping continual updates, and openly engaging with community. It’s still a disaster, it’s impressive that concord is somehow doing worse
341.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> I'm confident that creators of distinctive, original games will be able to find other publishers. That confidence is (partially) misplaced. It's a really rough world out there for indie devs, and if you do find a publisher, m
342.
by karlgkk 2y ago
The majority of businesses are not run by billionaires, in fact most of them are more tightly affiliated than the average large tech company. It's not nearly as simple as you're making it out, and those of us that work in large ca
343.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Every search engine and also LLMs engage in the same problematic behavior. Maybe just use Wikipedia search only then!
344.
by karlgkk 2y ago
This is pretty interesting, I didn't realize they were that old or independent. It's crazy to see how they managed to own a niche successfully for so long.
345.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Use the internet for a week without any search engine.
346.
by karlgkk 2y ago
It hadn’t been when I posted and when previous commenter posted. It was a silly typo
347.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> I think the underlying flaw here is that pointing your eyes at a virtual keyboard in space to type passwords is just a poor input method fwiw while you can do that, it's much easier to just poke the keys or use Siri a folding blue
348.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Didn’t read the article, did you?
349.
by karlgkk 2y ago
I’d support such a comparison if 100% of drivers were the top 10% of drivers
350.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Yes, that is the point. For non-consumer stuff, it doesn't matter as much.
351.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> I just don't see why they wouldn't eventually be able to dominate high end chip production. Tbh the comment you’re responding to lays it out pretty well. The next step is a MASSIVE step. Tbh for most consumer and military app
352.
by karlgkk 2y ago
It's not strange at all, you just have to investigate beyond the surface.
353.
by karlgkk 2y ago
It wasn't technically necessary, but neither was RISC-V. It's a matter of licensing independence.
354.
by karlgkk 2y ago
I think the friction here is from midsized companies. Where onboarding software that’s purchased is much harder than free software. I think it might be worth saying “SSO is free, up to n users”. Also this is pricing for “adequate security”,
355.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> Your missing the point: this was a solved problem 40 years ago and Tesla has decided to reinvent what works, for less capacity, with a far more difficult problem to solve and it’s somehow better? I never said it was or wasn't unso
356.
by karlgkk 2y ago
lol yeah although tbf American car fatality rates are pretty bad too
357.
by karlgkk 2y ago
Hey, I also live in a large metro with a great safety record! Yes, because of some serious engineering. Tons of effort with continual upgrades and maintenance. First of all, you seem to be assuming that I’m saying it’s not doable. It obviou
358.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> It’s a solved problem for real metros. This isn't a real metro. > My city has had and automated metro for nearly 40 years. Every year, in every country, there are failures that lead to fatalities. They are, thanks to technology
359.
by karlgkk 2y ago
> But it's not a particularly hard problem. Don't crash into the thing in front of you It turns out that this is a particularly hard problem. Oh, and if you get it wrong, people will die. In some cases, dozens of people.
360.
by karlgkk 2y ago
One of the editors who worked with him has started a Bookstore/Bar called Clio's in Oakland. If you're interested in picking up a copy of the quarterly in person, check it out.

More ›