kaoD

10 ms·

151.
by kaoD 1y ago
Yep, it was a typo. Thanks! Fixed.
152.
by kaoD 1y ago
Being invented by $company does not preclude it from being a standard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_standard > A technical standard may be developed privately or unilaterally, for example by a corporation
153.
by kaoD 1y ago
I mostly use these for prototyping. Even gold-coated fingers still suffer from abrasion after many inserts so there is no way these are durable.
154.
by kaoD 1y ago
What you're referring to are LLMs visiting your page via tool use. That's a drop in the ocean of crawlers that are racing to slurp as much of the internet as possible before it dries.
155.
by kaoD 1y ago
Web Components are anything but simple, are cumbersome and inconvenient, and have even more footguns than the already footgun-y React. Even if you only mean "custom elements" instead of "Web Components" (which "cust
156.
by kaoD 1y ago
OP's point is that respecting native behavior (React) is better.
157.
by kaoD 1y ago
Temporal[0] is coming which solves many many many issues with JS Date, 1-based months[1] included! Can't wait for it to be stable and widely available, it's just too good. > month values start at 1, which is different from lega
158.
by kaoD 1y ago
The only reason I can think of to 0-index months is so you can do monthName[date.getMonth()] instead of monthName[date.getMonth() - 1]. I don't think adding counterintuitive behavior to your data to save a "- 1" here and ther
159.
by kaoD 1y ago
I think you misinterpret the text you're quoting (but it's hard to tell since you didn't include a link). -X POST is not wrong, it's just superfluous when using other flags like -d where the method can be inferred. POST
160.
by kaoD 1y ago
It's a tradeoff. I expect this to be non-trivial, do nothing in the general case (when referring to runtime CSS vars) and possibly increase your final CSS size for any sufficiently complex codebase when unrolled.
161.
by kaoD 1y ago
Storing your food in the fridge requires an entire fridge (and power, and...) Your particular circumstances might not require it (maybe you're just temporarily camping or you only store non-perishable food) but that doesn't mean t
162.
by kaoD 1y ago
> is it really necessary to have this as an npm package ? Is anything really necessary? Not snark: almost nothing is necessary in life but many things are convenient .
163.
by kaoD 1y ago
For me the killer feature was distributed version control. When I was an intern at GenericCorpo we had days we couldn't work because SVN was down. WTF was that?
164.
by kaoD 1y ago
Just a guess but I assume that this is (or rather, would be, judging by the README this isn't past the planning stage) for IoT and the like. If you want your device to connect to a VPN you need something to implement the protocol. Cy
165.
by kaoD 1y ago
You made me realize it's like NASA: a good chunk of the worlds knows it, but I bet most don't know what it stands for (at least outside the US I bet 99.9% don't know -- me included haha)
166.
by kaoD 1y ago
Obvious troll is obvious. I shouldn't have taken the bait but for a second I wanted to assume good intentions. You are obviously not asking in good faith and just want an excuse to act self-righteous. So I'll let you do that. Alon
167.
by kaoD 1y ago
> And that the wave of people migrating from Vercel in light of Guillermo's post will not have any effect on React? If anything, a positive one.
168.
by kaoD 1y ago
Personally I really wanted RSC because I have a DIY SSG based on React. It's dead simple but only supports static components. Something like RSC would allow me to automatically cook a bundle with only the interactive parts (think e.g.
169.
by kaoD 1y ago
Care to elaborate?
170.
by kaoD 1y ago
To answer your first paragraph: neither. I don't care because I'm just analyzing Vercel's stewardship of React, and Vercel's CEO political stance has zero impact on React's health. This post is about React. Not abou
171.
by kaoD 1y ago
After seeing all the comments here I'm a bit relieved. I don't care about the CEO's political stance, but Vercel's involvement with React has rubbed me the wrong way since the start of development of RSC. The development
172.
by kaoD 1y ago
Reactivity has a specific meaning in programming: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactive_programming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_reactive_programmin... Which I think React doesn'
173.
by kaoD 1y ago
Just to clarify: despite its name, React has no reactivity engine at all and re-renders unconditionally on any state changes or parent re-renders. You have to opt-in to prop-diffing conditional re-renders (which I wouldn't call a &quot
174.
by kaoD 1y ago
I've had this happen too in VSCode, but for some reason I've never seen it since the GPT-5 Codex release? Are you perhaps on Windows+MinGW? That's the only weird thing in my setup (and it has caused problems in the past for m
175.
by kaoD 1y ago
> All my data is backed up to cloud How is that less worrisome? Your data is living in someone else's storage, waiting to be compromised.
176.
by kaoD 1y ago
Non-sequitur. Op comment is not criticizing that they offer another product, but that they offer another proprietary product that furthers locks you into their ecosystem.
177.
by kaoD 1y ago
I'm currently on my Nth run of: - I want to deploy a tiny service for personal use - That has occasional requests (think ~10 a day) - Needs to respond to a few daily events: a CRON job here and there, read an email, webhooks... Think a
178.
by kaoD 1y ago
https://who.is/whois/datatables.net
179.
by kaoD 1y ago
Might be cultural differences but, to me... > Kinda wish the author would attempt to collaborate rather than write stuff like this [...] but, whatever, it’s their blog so they can do what they want. ...feels like passive aggression. In p
180.
by kaoD 1y ago
What a terrible way to take constructive feedback. Writing not one but two blog posts takes time and effort, moreso when it includes investigation and examples... the posts are not just low effort "this is crap" rants (and they ev

More ›