kadoban

4 ms·

1.
by kadoban 8d ago
Only because I hadn't previously thought of it xD Step up from the standard ass-hat for sure.
2.
by kadoban 8d ago
How has software/driver support been? I got burned hard by AMD last generation or the one before. Things smoother now, or do you have to baby it like hell and pick and choose software that works?
3.
by kadoban 8d ago
Oh, wow, they think it's just a smidge below the q4? That's crazy good if true.
4.
by kadoban 9d ago
Honestly looks pretty good except whatever is going on with its booty. Is that an ass helmet? I cannot parse what's going on there.
5.
by kadoban 9d ago
My problem with that is the answer of if I'm too busy depends on what the request/question is. Does it need a huge context switch? Is it something I like working on? Etc.
6.
by kadoban 9d ago
You can run the ~4 bit quant(s) on 24gb, if you're not _too_ picky on context size. This will hopefully be better, though it'd be a _very_ surprising increase in performace at the size they say. Would love to see more about how it
7.
by kadoban 9d ago
> I don't think acid deserves such a scary reputation. Acid in general can be handled quite safely with the right mindset and equipment. HF is _fucking_ terrifying though. Even many professional chemists (or maybe especially pros?)
8.
by kadoban 10d ago
Inflation is high, so interest rates need to go up to try to slow that, but the economy isn't doing amazing already, and higher interest rates won't help that. Not to mention the US debt is _high_ as hell and bond yields mean that
9.
by kadoban 10d ago
> Because the Kremlin wants europe to take an overt action to justify mobilization. Do they? Why? They're already in a stalemate of a conflict, why would they want more fully-mobilized enemies?
10.
by kadoban 11d ago
> It's not, in most juridictions at least What did I miss they did that's illegal? It looked like it downloaded a public docker image, searched around inside, and verified that the key it found was still valid (without making a
11.
by kadoban 11d ago
> I know I can’t try and break into my neighbors house even if I have no intent of going inside and stealing once I break the lock. They didn't break in. They found a key that their neighbor dropped and returned it. > Is this leg
12.
by kadoban 11d ago
> Braess's/Pigou's Paradox that more car lanes cause more traffic was found in the 1920's. The paradox is that it _can_ cause worse traffic, not that it always does. American cities are built like shit for transport,
13.
by kadoban 13d ago
And does he have any reason at all to shape it towards slowing down?
14.
by kadoban 13d ago
You know you can monitor/reject things it attempts to do, right? For anything important I have it write scripts for what it wants to do, then I can review them for anything troubling.
15.
by kadoban 13d ago
Oh I'm aware that they're ~all assholes and many have gotten away with worse. It just seems like a poor argument that we're required to make it happen for them.
16.
by kadoban 13d ago
So, the person with vast incentives to keep the race to better models going as hard as possible? Good luck.
17.
by kadoban 13d ago
> Anthropic paid an average of $3000 per work they scanned based on their settlement Not sure you get to count breaking the law and getting in trouble in your cost-of-doing-business. That's a little too on the nose. You're basi
18.
by kadoban 13d ago
> That seemed silly at the time. Still does. It's an idiotic idea that only goes to show either how stupid Musk is or how stupid he thinks we are.
19.
by kadoban 14d ago
I think you know that's basically nothing like this? The model cards have every incentive to be biased, this doesn't necessarily. But even so, pretty much yes: companies that actually have reliable and accurate info in their relea
20.
by kadoban 14d ago
If it builds up history and perceived reliability, this type of thing can be valuable. You're giving up transparency for it being harder to game.
21.
by kadoban 15d ago
That's pretty good vfx, that'll be a useful tool. It has a couple of janky frames, the cup position is wrong on the first hard pan upwards, probably pretty easy to fix though. I believe there's already tools for essentially t
22.
by kadoban 15d ago
It almost would feel like a fair graph, but it's also below that one ~outlier in the middle. So it's ignoring all data but two points and purporting to fit an exponential to it. That's within spitting distance of meaningless,
23.
by kadoban 15d ago
It was created by Nixon, so yeah I'm sure the early days were a little weird (and it hasn't gotten any better since).
24.
by kadoban 15d ago
> The situation you're imagining is one of a global all encompassing depression caused by a single government. Doesn't even have to go that far (though it pretty easily can, the US is a big enough market). If the US causes a re
25.
by kadoban 15d ago
Can these big companies that want to distill not just get the models? Like how many machines at how many different providers are running Opus 5? Nobody is just throwing the model on a thumb drive and taking it home, or grabbing an old drive
26.
by kadoban 15d ago
> "Don't interrupt your opponent when they're making a mistake" Yeah, that's the obvious answer, but I suspect there's a point where if the US fucks things up too quickly and too messily, there's fewer
27.
by kadoban 15d ago
Is it me or is that not what that graph shows? That line has ~no relation to the datapoints it's purporting to be a fit for.
28.
by kadoban 15d ago
I think it's not even that sophisticated here, the providers are just lying.
29.
by kadoban 15d ago
The context of this is which party China would prefer to win the midterms. The dems winning would distract Trump from being able to fuck up the rest of the world a bit. My bet would be that China doesn't care much either way, they win
30.
by kadoban 15d ago
Yeah something must be actively broken or just an awful extension for it to have that much effect. Most things you can mess with the big effect is like, oh a thousand tokens ended up in the ~system prompt, or 10% extra or fewer work based o

More ›